2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00126-003-0400-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural controls on hydrothermal alteration and gold?antimony mineralisation in the Hillgrove area, NSW, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the paragenesis of Au deposits in the goldfield remain far from understood, there broadly appears to have been two phases of mineralisation: an earlier ductile phase that introduced arsenopyrite, gold and quartz which has been variably overprinted by a brittle phase associated with the aforementioned minerals as well as stibnite (Christie & Braithwaite 2003;Milham & Craw 2009). The occurrence of stibnite implies that the second mineralisation event occurred during or after uplift of the Greenland Group because this mineral commonly precipitates only at very shallow levels (Ashley & Craw 2004;Craw et al 2009). The first mineralisation event was synchronous with or post-dated regional folding of the Greenland Group, and both mineralisation events predate deposition of Eocene sediments that overlie mineralised structures; otherwise, the timing of mineralisation is unconstrained.…”
Section: Implications For the Reefton Goldfieldmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the paragenesis of Au deposits in the goldfield remain far from understood, there broadly appears to have been two phases of mineralisation: an earlier ductile phase that introduced arsenopyrite, gold and quartz which has been variably overprinted by a brittle phase associated with the aforementioned minerals as well as stibnite (Christie & Braithwaite 2003;Milham & Craw 2009). The occurrence of stibnite implies that the second mineralisation event occurred during or after uplift of the Greenland Group because this mineral commonly precipitates only at very shallow levels (Ashley & Craw 2004;Craw et al 2009). The first mineralisation event was synchronous with or post-dated regional folding of the Greenland Group, and both mineralisation events predate deposition of Eocene sediments that overlie mineralised structures; otherwise, the timing of mineralisation is unconstrained.…”
Section: Implications For the Reefton Goldfieldmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In their opinion, antimony deposits bear evidence for their formation under mesothermal conditions. Sev eral stages of mineralization have been distinguished at some Au-Sb deposits, and stibnite and gold-stibnite stages were the latest (Dill et al, 1995;Ashley and Grow, 2004;Kontak and Kerrich, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These settings have produced 40% of the world's antimony and have been mined in terranes ranging in age from Archaean, such as the "Antimony Line" in South Africa (Davis, Paterson, & Griffiths, 1986;Jaguin et al, 2013;Pearton & Viljoen, 1986) and the Wiluna deposit in Western Australia (Czarnota, Blewett, & Goscombe, 2010;Hagemann & L€ uders, 2003), to Phanerozoic, such as Hilgrove in New South Wales, Australia (Ashley & Craw, 2004;Boyle, 1990), Baogutu in northwest China (An & Zhu, 2010;Zheng, Zhu, An, Huang, & Qiu, 2015), La Lucette in France (Chauris & Marcoux, 1994;Pochon et al, 2016) and the Sarylakk and Sentachan deposits in Sakha-Yakutia, Russia (Bortnikov, Gamunin, Vilent'eva, Prokof'ev, & Prokop'ev, 2010). The deposits are hosted by low-grade, greenschist facies regionally metamorphosed rocks and may include stratabound gold-antimony mineralized rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%