2010
DOI: 10.2475/07.2010.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural constraints on the evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt in SW Mongolia

Abstract: International audienceWe provide a detailed description of the structures along a 300 km long and 50 km wide transect across the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) in southwestern Mongolia, covering the Precambrian Dzabkhan continental domain with overthrust Neoproterozoic ophiolites in the north (Lake Zone), a Silurian-Devonian passive margin association (Gobi-Altai Zone) and oceanic domain (Trans-Altai Zone) in the center, and a continental area (South Gobi Zone) in the south. Structural analysis suggests la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
160
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
11
160
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Terrane maps of Mongolia with accompanying stratigraphic columns and geochronological data provide a regional lithotectonic framework for understanding the region's crustal evolution [4,21]. More recently, new maps, structural and geochronological data, and gravity and magnetic models from different areas in southern Mongolia further refine the polyphase metamorphic, deformational, and magmatic evolution of the different terranes and call into question the locations of some previously mapped terrane boundaries [8,20,22].…”
Section: Paleozoic Terrane Assembly Of the Southern Caob In The Gobi mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Terrane maps of Mongolia with accompanying stratigraphic columns and geochronological data provide a regional lithotectonic framework for understanding the region's crustal evolution [4,21]. More recently, new maps, structural and geochronological data, and gravity and magnetic models from different areas in southern Mongolia further refine the polyphase metamorphic, deformational, and magmatic evolution of the different terranes and call into question the locations of some previously mapped terrane boundaries [8,20,22].…”
Section: Paleozoic Terrane Assembly Of the Southern Caob In The Gobi mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permian sediments from the Tien Shan through the Beishan to southern and eastern Mongolia and adjacent regions of China record the marine-terrestrial transition [23,24] and were affected by crustal shortening due to terminal closure of the final Paleo-Asian ocean seaway [5,7,18,25]. Collision-related crustal shortening likely persisted into the Triassic [5,8,18]. It is proposed that CAOB terrane amalgamation in southern Mongolia throughout the Paleozoic occurred along a north-south oriented active margin and that the accreted terrane assemblage was subsequently oroclinally bent in a counterclockwise sense during the Permo-Triassic into an east-west orientation and cut by sinistral strike-slip faults in the Triassic-mid Jurassic [8,9,24,26,27].…”
Section: Paleozoic Terrane Assembly Of the Southern Caob In The Gobi mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This area is located south of the Main Mongolian Lineament (Figure 1), which represents the main tectonic boundary separating the Neoproterozoic domain in the north, affected by early Palaeozoic orogenic event, from the early Palaeozoic domain to the south (e.g. Badarch, Cunningham, & Windley, 2002;Kröner et al, 2010;Ruzhentsev & Pospelov, 1992) affected by late Devonian to late Palaeozoic deformation and metamorphism (Edel, Schulmann, Hanžl, & Lexa, 2014;Lehmann et al, 2010;Xiao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This orogen was formed by accretion of Cambrian, Ordovician and Devono-Carboniferous arcs, back-arcs and accretionary wedges (Badarch et al 2002;Windley et al 2007) and Grenville-age microcontinents (RojasAgramonte et al 2011) of both Siberian and Gondwanan affinities (Cocks and Torsvik 2007;Wilhem et al 2012). The most puzzling is its mixed character, starting from purely Pacific-type accretionary system that developed progressively into collisional orogen of Tethysian type (Lehmann et al 2010;Xiao and Santosh 2014). Magmatic evolution of such a transient geodynamic setting may provide pivotal insight into understanding of differences between Circum-Pacific accretionary and collisional processes and can be used as a proxy of purely juvenile crustal growth or subsequent recycling of assembled crust.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%