2022
DOI: 10.3233/jpd-212997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Connectivity of Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation for Improving Freezing of Gait

Abstract: Background: Freezing of gait (FOG) is among the most common and disabling symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Studies show that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can reduce FOG severity. However, there is uncertainty about pathways that need to be modulated to improve FOG. Objective: To investigate whether STN-DBS effectively reduces FOG postoperatively and whether structural connectivity of the stimulated tissue explains variance of outcomes. Methods: We investigated 47 patients … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, lower FOG severity was related to a higher connectivity of the VAT with sensorimotor cortices (mainly BA 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8), which have been widely demonstrated to be activated in the preparation and execution phases of movement, including gait [29]. This result is in accordance with the recent report of a significant link between FOG improvement after STN-DBS and a higher connectivity with motor and premotor cortico-subthalamic fibres [14], as also reported for other parkinsonian motor signs, such as rigidity or akinesia [10]. In PD patients with STN-DBS, PET imaging also suggested that FOG severity improvement was associated with metabolic activity changes in sensory associative cortices [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, lower FOG severity was related to a higher connectivity of the VAT with sensorimotor cortices (mainly BA 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8), which have been widely demonstrated to be activated in the preparation and execution phases of movement, including gait [29]. This result is in accordance with the recent report of a significant link between FOG improvement after STN-DBS and a higher connectivity with motor and premotor cortico-subthalamic fibres [14], as also reported for other parkinsonian motor signs, such as rigidity or akinesia [10]. In PD patients with STN-DBS, PET imaging also suggested that FOG severity improvement was associated with metabolic activity changes in sensory associative cortices [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In a large retrospective cohort study, we found that the sweet spot for improving FOG was located more anteriorly within the STN, roughly corresponding to its centre, just beyond the posterior sensorimotor part of the nucleus [4]. In a recent retrospective study performed on a cohort of 47 PD patients with STN-DBS, a significant correlation between FOG improvement and the recruitment of premotor, motor and prefrontal dorsolateral corticosubthalamic fibres was also reported [14], suggesting a possible influence of cortico-subthalamic fibres recruitment in post-operative FOG improvement. Taken together, these data suggest that the effects of STN-DBS can be explained by both the modulation of the target site inside the STN and the fibres recruited within the VAT, especially the fibres belonging to the hyperdirect cortico-subthalamic pathway [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, an optogenetic study has demonstrated that gait improvement in STN-stimulated animals was related to the modulation of upstream connections between the STN and frontal cortices [56]. Likewise, a recent structural connectivity study has attributed the beneficial motor effects of STN stimulation in PD patients to the modulation of fiber tracts between the STN and motor cortex [57], suggesting that STN-DBS does not activate the PPN cholinergic neurons. Similarly, in our study we found no indication that magnetic stimulation in the STN influenced PPN cholinergic neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%