2009
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Connectivity for Visuospatial Attention: Significance of Ventral Pathways

Abstract: In the present study, we identified the most probable trajectories of point-to-point segregated connections between functional attentional centers using a combination of functional magnetic resonance imaging and a novel diffusion tensor imaging-based algorithm for pathway extraction. Cortical regions activated by a visuospatial attention task were subsequently used as seeds for probabilistic fiber tracking in 26 healthy subjects. Combining probability maps of frontal and temporoparietal regions yielded a netwo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
104
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
11
104
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Parietal fiber contributions to EmC were found to terminate primarily in insulate cortex (Pandya and Kuypers 1969;Jones and Powell 1970;Petrides and Pandya 1984;Schmahmann and Pandya 2006;Roberts et al 2007). While these data support the notion of a ventral pattern of connectivity of the VLPFC and IFGpt via the EmC, it cannot substantiate a direct prefronto-parietal connection as suggested by our and others DTI data (Catani et al 2002;Wakana et al 2004;Makris and Pandya 2009;Umarova et al 2010). We cannot rule out that methodological differences and shortcomings contribute to the partially divergent results of human DTI and animal tracer studies.…”
Section: The Imagery-specific Ventral Networkcontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parietal fiber contributions to EmC were found to terminate primarily in insulate cortex (Pandya and Kuypers 1969;Jones and Powell 1970;Petrides and Pandya 1984;Schmahmann and Pandya 2006;Roberts et al 2007). While these data support the notion of a ventral pattern of connectivity of the VLPFC and IFGpt via the EmC, it cannot substantiate a direct prefronto-parietal connection as suggested by our and others DTI data (Catani et al 2002;Wakana et al 2004;Makris and Pandya 2009;Umarova et al 2010). We cannot rule out that methodological differences and shortcomings contribute to the partially divergent results of human DTI and animal tracer studies.…”
Section: The Imagery-specific Ventral Networkcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…These prefrontal areas are known to connect toward posterior areas primarily along ventral fibers via the extreme capsule and not through dorsal AF/SLF pathways Kuypers 1969, Petrides andPandya 1984;Schmahmann andPandya 2006, Anwander et al 2007;Frey et al 2008). The dichotomization into ventral and dorsal processing streams in the visual system (Ungerleider and Mishkin 1982;Milner and Goodale 1996) has recently been extended to the domains of language and spatial attention Umarova et al 2010). Consequently, a functionally and anatomically segregated domain general architecture of dorsal and ventral white matter tracks in the brain, connecting post-and prerolandic cortices, has been proposed (Weiller et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings suggest that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex may also support much lower-level encoding processes that set the stage for later perceptual priming. Attentional binding is one such prerequisite for priming (Hayman and Jacoby, 1989;Schacter et al, 1991;Richardson-Klavehn and Gardiner, 1998), and could be achieved via the strong connections of this area with the ventral posterior parietal lobe (Petrides and Pandya, 1999;Petrides, 2005;Umarova et al, 2010). Support for a binding function of the superior PFC comes from an fMRI investigation showing that connectivity between this same area and modality-specific late visual areas predicts successful associative recognition (Summerfield et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated that the perisylvian parietal, superior temporal, and lateral frontal cortices are tightly connected in the human right hemisphere (Gharabaghi et al 2009;Umarova et al 2009). Additionally, the middle component of the superior longitudinal fasciculus connects between the lateral FEF and the aIPS in a nonhuman primate (see DISCUSSION in Lee et al 2006).…”
Section: Right Asymmetry Of the Saccadic/attentional Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%