Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 2003
DOI: 10.1002/0471266949.bmc017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Concepts in the Prediction of the Toxicity of Therapeutical Agents

Abstract: Currently available substructure‐based structure‐activity relationship (SAR) methodologies, if expertly used, can be employed to predict the toxicological potential of therapeutic agents. Moreover, with robust SAR models of toxicological phenomena, it is feasible to understand the basis of these toxicities and to ascertain their relevance to possible human health risks. At present, SAR approaches to the evaluation of toxicity must be used in conjunction with human expert knowledge. The currently available tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ACD), the computer automated structure evaluation (CASE) program automatically fragments each molecular structure, also accounting for spatial relations and thus the activating or deactivating (modulating) effects within the structure [Rosenkranz and Klopman, 1995]. Statistical analysis then determines which fragments are associated with activity (biophores) and those that are not (biophobes), creating a system-internal, empirical set of rules (rulebases) which differentiate between activating and deactivating fragments, describing their relative importance in active versus inactive structures.…”
Section: Structure-activity Relationships Predictive Of Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACD), the computer automated structure evaluation (CASE) program automatically fragments each molecular structure, also accounting for spatial relations and thus the activating or deactivating (modulating) effects within the structure [Rosenkranz and Klopman, 1995]. Statistical analysis then determines which fragments are associated with activity (biophores) and those that are not (biophobes), creating a system-internal, empirical set of rules (rulebases) which differentiate between activating and deactivating fragments, describing their relative importance in active versus inactive structures.…”
Section: Structure-activity Relationships Predictive Of Sensitizationmentioning
confidence: 99%