2002
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2002.1159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Components of Humic Acids as Determined by Chemical Modifications and Carbon‐13 NMR, Pyrolysis‐, and Thermochemolysis‐Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: The chemical structure of humic acids (HAs) extracted from a grassland surface soil and peat were studied using bleaching (NaClO2 oxidation) and acid hydrolysis (6 M HCl) in combination with advanced analytical techniques: solid‐state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), pyrolysis‐gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), and tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) thermochemolysis‐GC/MS. The purpose of the chemical treatments was to remove known structural fragments from the HA to study the building blocks … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major structures include cuticular components (species derived from the cuticular coating of plant leaves) peptide/proteins, lignin, and carbohydrate . This is consistent with other NMR studies that identify these components (Almendros et al, 1991a ;K ö gel -Knabner et al, 1992 ;Zech et al, 1992 ;Knicker and Ludemann, 1995 ;Rumpel et al, 1998 ;Fan et al, 2000 ;Haiber et al, 2001a ;Chefetz et al, 2002 ;Simpson, 2002 ;Simpson et al, 2002a ) in abundance in soil organic matter. This is logical considering that soluble NOM from soils is operationally defi ned and at any one time microbial and plant residues will be the major contributors to soil biomass (K ö gel -Knabner, 2002 ).…”
Section: Understanding Solution -State 1 D and 2 D Data Of Nomsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The major structures include cuticular components (species derived from the cuticular coating of plant leaves) peptide/proteins, lignin, and carbohydrate . This is consistent with other NMR studies that identify these components (Almendros et al, 1991a ;K ö gel -Knabner et al, 1992 ;Zech et al, 1992 ;Knicker and Ludemann, 1995 ;Rumpel et al, 1998 ;Fan et al, 2000 ;Haiber et al, 2001a ;Chefetz et al, 2002 ;Simpson, 2002 ;Simpson et al, 2002a ) in abundance in soil organic matter. This is logical considering that soluble NOM from soils is operationally defi ned and at any one time microbial and plant residues will be the major contributors to soil biomass (K ö gel -Knabner, 2002 ).…”
Section: Understanding Solution -State 1 D and 2 D Data Of Nomsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The aromatic compounds identified in HULIS were remarkably similar to pyrolysis products of HAs, FAs and lignin (Martin et al, 1994(Martin et al, , 1995del Rio et al, 1998;Chefetz et al, 2002;Li et al, 2006;Fukushima et al, 2011). All HULIS pyrograms present two distinct peaks at 32.8 min and 34.5 min (Nos.…”
Section: Sample Functional Groups (%)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…is procedure was used in previous studies for characterization of soils of various environments [29,30]. e HAs were demineralized by shaking overnight in 0.1 M HCl/0.3 M HF (solid/solution ratio 1 : 1) and then repeatedly washed with deionized water until pH 3 was reached; they were then freeze-dried [31][32][33].…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups of structural compounds were identified using the following chemical shifts values: 190-170 ppm for the carboxyl group and amidic carbonyl; 170-150 ppm for the aromatic C of phenols and phenol esters; 150-135 ppm for the alkylaromatics; 135-108 ppm for the protonized aromatic carbon, bridgehead C; 108-70 ppm for the cellulose anomeric carbon and hemiacetal carbon; 70-50 ppm for the resonance region of C-H bonds, secondary alcohols, and other carbon atoms bound to oxygen; 50-32 ppm for the methyl group resonance region of aliphatic and aromatic ethyl ethers, amino acid carbons, and methyl esters of carboxylic groups; 32-27 ppm for the resonance region of quaternary carbon and CH carbons; 27-10 ppm for the resonance region of CH 2 alkyl structures in transconformation; and 10-0 ppm for the resonance region of alkyl methyls and CH 2 units [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%