Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096905-3.00050-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural components of aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some texts, 1 the symbol J is reserved for the polar second moment of area which is not implied here. Furthermore, in some texts on thin shell theory, 11 where the product of the shell thickness and the second moment of length is used extensively, the symbol I is employed and the implied meaning must be discerned from the context.…”
Section: Centroid Of a Surface Of Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some texts, 1 the symbol J is reserved for the polar second moment of area which is not implied here. Furthermore, in some texts on thin shell theory, 11 where the product of the shell thickness and the second moment of length is used extensively, the symbol I is employed and the implied meaning must be discerned from the context.…”
Section: Centroid Of a Surface Of Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar result is obtained for the position of the centroid in the y -direction, where cosθ is replaced by sinθ in the integral to yield, Finally, the position of the centroid in the z -direction is, Noting that both the radial position r and the axial position z are not functions of θ gives, where the second integral is recognized as the product second moment of length of the generating plane figure relative to the r - and z -axes, J rz , 11 giving the final result, …”
Section: Centroid Of a Surface Of Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complex structure can be idealized into simpler models that behave in a similar manner as the real structure. Megson (2007) proposes in ideal mechanical model based on a skin-boom combination. The conservative assumptions behind this model are that stringers and spars can be substituted by area concentrations, which will carry all direct stresses, while the skins will carry only shear stresses.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the shear loads acting on the skin panels and the boom’s normal loads are evaluated. More details on the calculation process can be consulted in Ricci (2019) and Megson (2007). The model also provides longitudinal and angular displacements at the wingtip position.…”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact load was then estimated using Newton's second law of motion and the given deceleration. The idealized beam method, as laid out by Megson [35], was then applied and iterated until a minimum-weight configuration was reached.…”
Section: Wing Construction and Draining Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%