2008
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.mra2008034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Characterization of Stress-Induced Martensitic Transformation in a Polycrystalline Austenitic Fe-Mn-Si-Cr Alloy

Abstract: Stress-induced martensitic transformation in Fe-Mn-Si alloys is characterized by the transformation of the fcc matrix to the hcp phase, which is generally reversible. In this study, Debye rings obtained by monochromated X-ray diffraction using synchrotron radiation were used for analyzing the structural change of the fcc matrix to the hcp phase in a polycrystalline austenitic Fe-Mn-Si-Cr alloy that was deformed by the tensile test at room temperature. Structural changes resulting from the reverse transformatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the unidirectional austenite of the alloy is subjected to shear stress, the Shockley partial dislocation moves in the most favorable direction which promotes the growth of a single type of martensite. The ε martensite with the preferred orientation undergoes a huge shearing deformation, resulting in a significant change in the shape of the alloy [78]. At this time, heating the alloy to above A f can activate the reverse transformation (γ → ε), and the Shockley partial dislocations move in the opposite direction to martensite transformation (see Figure 4c).…”
Section: Crystallographic Features Of γ → ε Martensite Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the unidirectional austenite of the alloy is subjected to shear stress, the Shockley partial dislocation moves in the most favorable direction which promotes the growth of a single type of martensite. The ε martensite with the preferred orientation undergoes a huge shearing deformation, resulting in a significant change in the shape of the alloy [78]. At this time, heating the alloy to above A f can activate the reverse transformation (γ → ε), and the Shockley partial dislocations move in the opposite direction to martensite transformation (see Figure 4c).…”
Section: Crystallographic Features Of γ → ε Martensite Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After being subsequently annealed at 873 K (600°C), the alloy's shape recovery ratio further increased to 90 pct due to the reduction in the dislocations, which inhibit the stress-induced e-martensitic transformation. [13,[37][38][39] On the contrary, after being subsequently annealed at 1373 K (1100°C), the alloy's shape recovery ratio decreased to 76 pct because of the reduction in the amount of stacking faults, which are beneficial to stress-induced e-martensitic transformation. [5] For solution-treated alloy after heating at 1523 K (1250°C) and air cooling, a high density of twin boundaries, which has a negative effect on the shape memory effect, still existed ( Figure 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…When plastically deformed SMAs are annealed over temperatures of about 600 K, the ε−γ reverse transformation occurs. Although the shape-recovering abilities of SMAs are due to the reverse martensitic transformation, they are significantly affected by the polycrystalline microstructure and texture of SMAs during stress-induced martensitic and reverse martensitic transformations [3,4]. As the overall shape recovery characteristics of SMAs may also be affected by the mechanical residual stresses in them, it is of great importance to be able to characterize the evolution of residual stresses in polycrystalline SMAs during deformation and annealing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%