2012
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20122900048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural characterization of mechanically alloyed nanocrystalline Cu-Fe: Strain broadening due to dislocations

Abstract: Abstract. Nanocrystalline Cu(Fe) solid solution was successfully synthesized by using high-energy mechanical milling. The structural and morphological changes during mechanical milling were investigated by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The patterns so obtained were analyzed using the X'Pert High Score Plus program. The final product of the mechanical alloying process was nanocrystalline FCC Cu(Fe) solid solution with a mean crystallite size in the range of few nanometers. The final micros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the size variation, the milling process results in nanometric particles, as discussed in previous works [12,21]. The D(t) and ( ) η t behaviors are similar to those observed in other 4f- [18,21] and 3d-Cu [26] based planetary-milled alloys, and the only most noticeable difference is, as commented on above, the reduced time required to achieve nanometric particle sizes. For example, t = 300 h for D = 14 nm TbAl 2 [21], t = 120 h for D = 21 nm GdAl 2 [18] and t = 20 h for D = 18 nm YbAl 3 [24], while for TbCu 2 only t = 0.5 h was necessary to reduce particle size down to D = 23 nm.…”
Section: Structure Of Tbcu 2 Nanoparticlessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Regarding the size variation, the milling process results in nanometric particles, as discussed in previous works [12,21]. The D(t) and ( ) η t behaviors are similar to those observed in other 4f- [18,21] and 3d-Cu [26] based planetary-milled alloys, and the only most noticeable difference is, as commented on above, the reduced time required to achieve nanometric particle sizes. For example, t = 300 h for D = 14 nm TbAl 2 [21], t = 120 h for D = 21 nm GdAl 2 [18] and t = 20 h for D = 18 nm YbAl 3 [24], while for TbCu 2 only t = 0.5 h was necessary to reduce particle size down to D = 23 nm.…”
Section: Structure Of Tbcu 2 Nanoparticlessupporting
confidence: 80%