2020
DOI: 10.3390/biom10081130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Characterization of an S-enantioselective Imine Reductase from Mycobacterium Smegmatis

Abstract: NADPH-dependent imine reductases (IREDs) are enzymes capable of enantioselectively reducing imines to chiral secondary amines, which represent important building blocks in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry. Since their discovery in 2011, many previously unknown IREDs have been identified, biochemically and structurally characterized and categorized into families. However, the catalytic mechanism and guiding principles for substrate specificity and stereoselectivity remain disputed. Herein, we describe t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those interactions could form a bottleneck that may hinder the entering and coupling of the bulky substrates. To interrupt such interactions, we superimposed NADP(H)‐complex structures of six IREDs [5a–d,q,r] with that of IR‐G36 (Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6) to seek the promising site on the loop 252–261 for mutation. In those structures, NADP(H) can form hydrogen bonds either with the top loop 252–261 or with the bottom loop 119–123 (Figure 1B, Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6), and accordingly generate two dissimilar types of IRED‐cavities, which we termed “narrow‐type” and “wide‐type” (Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those interactions could form a bottleneck that may hinder the entering and coupling of the bulky substrates. To interrupt such interactions, we superimposed NADP(H)‐complex structures of six IREDs [5a–d,q,r] with that of IR‐G36 (Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6) to seek the promising site on the loop 252–261 for mutation. In those structures, NADP(H) can form hydrogen bonds either with the top loop 252–261 or with the bottom loop 119–123 (Figure 1B, Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6), and accordingly generate two dissimilar types of IRED‐cavities, which we termed “narrow‐type” and “wide‐type” (Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the NADPH binding site, the pocket cavity of IR-G02 showed a strong negative electrostatic surface potential (Fig. 5a), which may favor the entry of positively charged amine donors and imine intermediate 27 , and contribute to its high substrate promiscuity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approximate classification cannot be applied to all IREDs, as different stereoselectivities have been described depending on the substrate [12,18] . This is illustrated by recently characterized IREDs that were found to be ( S )‐selective despite having aspartic acid as a pendant residue in the active site [19,20] . In addition, single‐point variants of the IRED from Amycolatopsis orientalis displayed inverted stereoselectivity compared to the wild‐type [21] .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 12 , 18 ] This is illustrated by recently characterized IREDs that were found to be ( S )‐selective despite having aspartic acid as a pendant residue in the active site. [ 19 , 20 ] In addition, single‐point variants of the IRED from Amycolatopsis orientalis displayed inverted stereoselectivity compared to the wild‐type. [21] Despite extensive studies of IREDs,[ 12 , 16 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ] the molecular mechanism of asymmetric imine reduction and, if relevant, imine protonation, remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%