1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90110-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural changes of monolithic silica gel during the gel-to-glass transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 It has been pointed that most alkoxide-derived gels may not exhibit a CRP since the liquid phase of the gel is a mixture of water and alcohol. 7 Kawaguchi et al 9 found the evaporation rate to be initially constant for large pore silica gel, meanwhile Hench and Wilson 8 did not find a constant rate of loss of weight during drying alkoxide-derived gels, even when normalized to the surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 It has been pointed that most alkoxide-derived gels may not exhibit a CRP since the liquid phase of the gel is a mixture of water and alcohol. 7 Kawaguchi et al 9 found the evaporation rate to be initially constant for large pore silica gel, meanwhile Hench and Wilson 8 did not find a constant rate of loss of weight during drying alkoxide-derived gels, even when normalized to the surface area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, application of this model to strain data obtained on mesoporous glass with dilatometric setups during gas adsorption revealed that Bangham's model alone was only partially able to explain the observed effects [4,5]. The issue of mesopore deformation received renewed attention in the context of drying and characterization of silica aerogels in the 1980's and 90's [6][7][8]. Using in-situ dilatometry measurements Reichenauer and Scherer demonstrated large sorption-induced strains exceeding 40 vol % during the characterization of aerogels with nitrogen sorption at 77 K, which lead to highly erroneous pore size distributions [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCC-treated silica samples were polished to remove the surface layers by a set of silicon carbide sandpapers [37,38]: 320-grit first, then 600-grit, 1200-grit, and eventually 2500-grit. Before the SCC treatment, the sample thickness was 10-14 mm; after the calcination, the thickness shrank to 7-9 mm.…”
Section: Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%