1981
DOI: 10.1271/bbb1961.45.1969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural changes in starch molecules during the malting of barley.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of starch reached for WS on G3 (14 g/100 g d.b.) was similar to the percentage of loss of barley malt starch .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loss of starch reached for WS on G3 (14 g/100 g d.b.) was similar to the percentage of loss of barley malt starch .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These results suggest that protease activity was modified significantly by germination temperature, achieving greater activity at 30°C. Kano et al also observed a higher content of free amino acids in a variety of sorghum germinated at 30°C compared to 20°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The starch structure considered in this study includes the molecular size distributions of individual branches (known as the chain-length distribution or CLD) and whole (fully branched) starch molecules obtained through sizeexclusion chromatography (SEC) equipped with differential refractive index detection, as well as the average degree of branching (DB) of starch molecules obtained through 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Early work (Kano et al 1981;Bertoft and Henriksnas 1983) to describe the detailed changes in size distributions of starch molecules during malting probably had some technical limitations, such as the loss of partially hydrolyzed starch molecules during starch isolation owing to their high water solubility and the retrogradation of AM branches during SEC analysis in water. The loss of partially hydrolyzed starch molecules has been overcome here by using a technique that simultaneously dissolves starch molecules and removes nonstarch components in the grain without the need of preisolation of starch granules Syahariza et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that the first peak eluting from the chromatographic column is the branched amylopectin, while the relatively linear amylose was left intact. The lower molecular weight fragments from debranching amylopectin were found in two peaks located to the right of amylose in the chromatogram (data not shown) in a typical bimodal distribution pattern (Lii and Lineback 1977;Kano et al 1981). The series of chromatograms illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Enzymatic Degradation Of Native Starchmentioning
confidence: 83%