2011
DOI: 10.1021/bm200351y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Changes in Microcrystalline Cellulose in Subcritical Water Treatment

Abstract: Subcritical water is a high potential green chemical for the hydrolysis of cellulose. In this study microcrystalline cellulose was treated in subcritical water to study structural changes of the cellulose residues. The alterations in particle size and appearance were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and those in the degree of polymerization (DP) and molar mass distributions by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). Further, changes in crystallinity and crystallite dimensions were quantified by wide-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
31
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(78 reference statements)
9
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The crystallinity analysis of the whiskers and MCC samples resulted in values between 50 and 55 %, with the exception of 58 % for the freeze-dried cotton whiskers. Even though the crystallinity values are not as high as some of those reported for cellulose whiskers in literature (Moon et al 2011), our values are assumed to give an accurate estimate of the absolute crystallinity (Park et al 2010), because they are based on the analysis of the entire WAXS pattern and they have been previously shown to be in accordance with NMR crystallinities of MCC (Andersson et al 2004;Tolonen et al 2011). …”
Section: Chemical and Crystal Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The crystallinity analysis of the whiskers and MCC samples resulted in values between 50 and 55 %, with the exception of 58 % for the freeze-dried cotton whiskers. Even though the crystallinity values are not as high as some of those reported for cellulose whiskers in literature (Moon et al 2011), our values are assumed to give an accurate estimate of the absolute crystallinity (Park et al 2010), because they are based on the analysis of the entire WAXS pattern and they have been previously shown to be in accordance with NMR crystallinities of MCC (Andersson et al 2004;Tolonen et al 2011). …”
Section: Chemical and Crystal Structurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, both methods can be interpreted with a simplified twophase model in which a material consists of only purely crystalline and amorphous components. In this model the paracrystalline contribution is included in the NMR-crystallinity (Tolonen et al 2011). This streamlined model is used in this article when NMRand XRD-crystallinities are compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCC1 is known as Avicel PH-102, MCC2 as Vivapur 105 and MCC3, which was measured earlier (Tolonen et al 2011), is from Merck (No. 1.02330.0500).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant sugar-based macromolecule of wood cell walls, cellulose is known for its ability to form very stable aggregated structures which are only accessible for water in harsh physical conditions of elevated temperature and pressure (above 200°C and 25 MPa;Deguchi et al 2008). Although cellulose is also thermally degraded under such conditions (Tolonen et al 2011(Tolonen et al , 2013, the crystals are seen to completely dissolve in water under very short reaction times (less than 10 s) forming amorphous cellulose fragments (Deguchi et al 2008;Tolonen et al 2013), which nonetheless re-crystallises upon drying (Tolonen et al 2011). From this it is seen that cellulose has an innate tendency to form aggregated structures which are partly inaccessible for water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%