2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural changes in functionally illiterate adults after intensive training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that while the FPC structure before learning prospectively predicted the participants who would become Achievers, persistent daily training induced neuroplastic changes in the FPC structure. This experience-dependent neuroplasticity coincides with previous findings that suggest that neuroplastic changes were accompanied by improvement in cognitive ability 5,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41] . Importantly, a recent study revealed that the lateral FPC is specifically involved in the metacognitive control of decision adjustment in situations where no explicit feedback is available 31 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed that while the FPC structure before learning prospectively predicted the participants who would become Achievers, persistent daily training induced neuroplastic changes in the FPC structure. This experience-dependent neuroplasticity coincides with previous findings that suggest that neuroplastic changes were accompanied by improvement in cognitive ability 5,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41] . Importantly, a recent study revealed that the lateral FPC is specifically involved in the metacognitive control of decision adjustment in situations where no explicit feedback is available 31 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We first performed three experiments that differed in time scales (hours to months) and task domain (cognitive, language, and motor learning) to test whether specific brain areas, particularly the FPC, predicted persistence across different types of behaviors at an individual level. Next, we used a measure of structural neuroplasticity that underlies several types of learning 5,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41] to investigate whether coaching strategies (i.e., subgoal setting) affected the neural basis of persistence and thereby modulated goal-directed persistence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with the findings of statistically significant age-vs-DTI-metrics correlations, the present results highlight the necessity of considering age effects in related studies. Specifically, in studies including adult subjects covering large age span (Welcome and Joanisse, 2014 ; Boltzmann et al, 2017 ), possible age effects should be considered carefully, otherwise spurious results possibly reflecting age-effects, rather than the effect under investigation, may be obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the effects of microstructural changes from early to mid-adulthood, if there are any, have not been considered carefully in related studies. For instance, in some studies including adult subjects covering large age span (e.g., of 19–59 years in the study by Welcome and Joanisse ( 2014 ) and of 25–58 years in the study by Boltzmann et al ( 2017 ), possible age effects were not specially considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a relatively small and focal change in anatomy could theoretically produce widespread functional changes, and therefore these effects need not be accompanied by large-scale anatomical remodeling. Indeed, a small number of past studies in human subjects have reported focal changes in white matter after training of reading skills 32,65 , but past work has not employed the intensive training paradigm used here (see also 33 ). Alternatively, the widespread effects may reflect general mechanisms of learning during an intensive educational experience, and therefore may not be specific to the curriculum of this reading intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%