2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3234-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Changes in Foods Caused by High-Pressure Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, different trends were observed after the application of HPP, as IVTDMD seemed to increase (p < 0.05) after the application of both 400 and 600 MPa, to a maximum of 5%. During HPP, different processes can occur at the same time, including enzyme-catalyzed conversion processes, chemical reactions, and modification of biopolymers, depending on the product and parameters applied [13]. However, more research should be done to investigate the nutritional composition and digestibility of individual compounds (CP, AA, NDF) before we can conclusively assess the potential effect of HPP on BSF composition and the monogastric and ruminant digestibility.…”
Section: In Vitro Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, different trends were observed after the application of HPP, as IVTDMD seemed to increase (p < 0.05) after the application of both 400 and 600 MPa, to a maximum of 5%. During HPP, different processes can occur at the same time, including enzyme-catalyzed conversion processes, chemical reactions, and modification of biopolymers, depending on the product and parameters applied [13]. However, more research should be done to investigate the nutritional composition and digestibility of individual compounds (CP, AA, NDF) before we can conclusively assess the potential effect of HPP on BSF composition and the monogastric and ruminant digestibility.…”
Section: In Vitro Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-pressure processing (HPP) is a volumetric, non-thermal, pasteurizing method that uses pressures of between 150 to 600 MPa. HPP results in an effective reduction of microbial counts with minimal effect on nutritional content, although it may also induce structural changes in food systems, especially when pressures higher than 400 MPa are used [13]. Therefore, HPP and TP may be useful in reducing the microbial load of BSF larvae, although they may differently affect monogastric and ruminant digestibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of natural food ingredients with enhanced functionality, such as emulsifi ers, stabilizers, texturizers and water retention intended ingredients by HPP-induced modifi cations in protein and starch matrixes, has also been the focus of several investigations (Galazka et al ., 2000;Dumay et al ., 2006Dumay et al ., , 2012Bolumar et al ., 2014). The application of HPP appears effective in improving meat (Bajovic et al ., 2012;Sun and Holley 2010), egg (Ngarize et al ., 2005;Miyoshi and Koseki, 2010) and soy (Roesch and Corredig, 2003;Wang et al ., 2008) protein gelation properties, as well as the coagulating properties of milk (Bouaouinaa et al ., 2006;Considine et al ., 2007;Lim et al ., 2008;Venir et al ., 2010).…”
Section: Effect Of Hpp On Food Texture and Functionalitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In relation to product parameters, the type of protein/carbohydrate, concentration, pK a , pH, ionic strength, solubility, intramolecular and intermolecular interactions are relevant. And in relation to process parameters: pressure level, pressure-rise gradient, pressure holding time, product initial temperature and temperature have to be considered (Bolumar et al ., 2014). All these variables might play a role in the desired structure modifi cation and must be related to fi nal optimization and development.…”
Section: Effect Of Hpp On Food Macro-componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural changes of proteins and expected change in softness upon HPP (modified fromBolumar et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%