2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00505-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural brain measures among children with and without ADHD in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study cohort: a cross-sectional US population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, this study takes a dimensional approach to include the full spectrum of attention problems in the ABCD sample (3, 71). Previous work in the ABCD study indicates that 949 individuals (7.99%) met ADHD diagnostic criteria, but the ABCD study also includes many youth with subclinical symptoms and youth with minimal attention problems (48). Despite these methodological differences, the current findings are consistent with previous work in children with ADHD and generalize to a representative sample of US youth (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, this study takes a dimensional approach to include the full spectrum of attention problems in the ABCD sample (3, 71). Previous work in the ABCD study indicates that 949 individuals (7.99%) met ADHD diagnostic criteria, but the ABCD study also includes many youth with subclinical symptoms and youth with minimal attention problems (48). Despite these methodological differences, the current findings are consistent with previous work in children with ADHD and generalize to a representative sample of US youth (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these questions, we examine the relationship between intra-individual variability (IIV) in timed cognitive tasks and resting-state FC from the ABCD study, a population-based, longitudinal cohort of 11,878 9-10 year olds. In contrast to previous work, this study captures the full spectrum of attention problems during a period of dynamic cognitive and neural development (47,48). The main hypotheses using cross-sectional data at baseline were the information (n=2) or parental income (n=1022); (2) missing trial-wise neuropsychological test data for the Flanker (n=1310), Pattern Comparison Processing Speed (n=1316), Dimensional Change Card Sort (n=1687); or (3) missing psychiatric symptom data at baseline (n =10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an essential tool for measuring neuroanatomical and functional variation of the human brain. Structural and functional imaging derived features have been used for understanding brain-behavioral associations (Bernanke J et al, 2022), neurodevelopment (Bethlehem RAI et al, 2022), and the purported impact of environmental exposures on the brain (Marshall AT et al, 2020). Although effect sizes and test-retest reliability of MRI features have recently been critically examined (Dick et al 2021; Kennedy JT et al, 2022; Marek S et al, 2022), the internal validity of associations based on neuroimaging features has seldom been discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within neuroimaging studies of ADHD, except for a few large investigations (3,9,10), studies have generally matched or adjusted for a few demographic variables (e.g., age, sex) and neuroimaging metrics or parameters. Of the 19 studies included in a systematic review of neuroimaging studies on ADHD (11), 17 adjusted or matched for age in their analyses, 14 for sex, 9 for precision variables like study site, and 8 for the intelligence quotient (IQ) ( Supplementary Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%