2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Basis of a Rationally Rewired Protein-Protein Interface Critical to Bacterial Signaling

Abstract: Summary Two-component signal transduction systems typically involve a sensor histidine kinase that specifically phosphorylates a single, cognate response regulator. This protein-protein interaction relies on molecular recognition via a small set of residues in each protein. To better understand how these residues determine the specificity of kinase-substrate interactions, we rationally rewired the interaction interface of a Thermotoga maritima two-component system, HK853-RR468, to match that found in a differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
72
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
72
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ␣3 helices of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and chloroflexi display substantial sequence similarity, the highly divergent ␣3 helix sequences of the Xanthomonadaceae/Pseudomonadaceae, the Cyanobacteria, and the Gallionellales cluster target a structurally similar motif that has been shown be bound by several noncognate LexA proteins (50,51). Recent work on the PhoQ-PhoP two-component signal transduction system has shown that there is a remarkable degree of sequence plasticity in the PhoQ-PhoP interface and that evolution has explored only a small fraction of the space of the PhoP-specific PhoQ motifs, due to both physiological and biochemical constraints on available mutational pathways (70)(71)(72). The results presented here suggest that the same is true for the LexA protein-DNA interface, which displays a varied palette of ␣3 helix and LexA-binding motif pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the ␣3 helices of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and chloroflexi display substantial sequence similarity, the highly divergent ␣3 helix sequences of the Xanthomonadaceae/Pseudomonadaceae, the Cyanobacteria, and the Gallionellales cluster target a structurally similar motif that has been shown be bound by several noncognate LexA proteins (50,51). Recent work on the PhoQ-PhoP two-component signal transduction system has shown that there is a remarkable degree of sequence plasticity in the PhoQ-PhoP interface and that evolution has explored only a small fraction of the space of the PhoP-specific PhoQ motifs, due to both physiological and biochemical constraints on available mutational pathways (70)(71)(72). The results presented here suggest that the same is true for the LexA protein-DNA interface, which displays a varied palette of ␣3 helix and LexA-binding motif pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented here suggest that the same is true for the LexA protein-DNA interface, which displays a varied palette of ␣3 helix and LexA-binding motif pairs. Importantly, however, the available data indicate that the coevolution of the LexA recognition domain and its binding motif may face more restrictions than those displayed by two-component systems (70,71,73). In particular, the abundance of highly divergent ␣3 helix sequences targeting a similar, B. subtilis-type LexA-binding motif yields two nonexclusive scenarios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross talk at the level of phosphoryl transfer has been described in other TCSs and can be predicted based on the identity of specific coevolving residues found in HKs and RRs (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Analysis Of Gene Expression By Quantitative Reverse Transcrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention of one TCS with the signal transduction of another, termed cross talk between TCSs, can be minimized through the phosphatase activity of HKs, through temporal/spatial regulation, and through specific molecular recognition between cognate HKs and RRs (17). The latter has been extensively explored, with specificity between cognate HK/RR pairs attributed to specific coevolving residues that dictate if a phosphoryl transfer event can occur efficiently (18)(19)(20). With this molecular specificity, an HK can use its kinase and phosphatase functions to control the level of phosphorylated cognate RR without interfering with the signaling of other HK/RR pairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B). For histidine kinases, mutating just three or four interfacial residues to match those found in another kinase is often sufficient to reprogram partner specificity Podgornaia et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%