1991
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90387-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural basis for the regulation of splicing of a yeast messenger RNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The YRA1 intron is unusual in size, location within the coding region, and in the sequence of one of the consensus splicing signals (Portman et al+, 1997 (2002) was that cells expressing YRA1 containing the RPL25 intron from the YRA1 promoter had a slight dominantnegative growth defect at 37 8C+ Intriguingly, some of the introns we have tested, notably that of ACT1, could partially complement the growth defect of YRA1-⌬IVS+ It thus seems that the YRA1 intron shares some characteristics that are relevant for autoregulation with a subset of introns from unrelated yeast genes+ These observations will likely facilitate the identification of cisacting regulatory elements in the YRA1 transcript+ For example, like the YRA1 intron, the RPL25 and ACT1 introns are unusually large (414 and 408 nt, respectively), whereas both the UBC8 and YRA1 introns have branchpoint sequences that differ from the normally highly conserved consensus at the first position (CAC UAAC and GACUAAC, respectively)+ In addition, the discrepancies between our findings and those of Rodriguez-Navarro et al+ (2002) might, at least in part, also reflect subtle differences in the experimental details involved, such as different strain backgrounds or plasmid-copy numbers+ Even though we do not know at this point which of the peculiarities of the YRA1 intron mentioned above are involved in autoregulation, each of these characteristics has been shown to be important in the few reports of regulated splicing in yeast+ One prominent example is the meiosis-specific splicing of MER2 premRNA+ During mitotic growth, basal splicing efficiency is lowered by a noncanonical 59 splice site and an unusually large 59 exon (Engebrecht et al+, 1991;Nandabalan & Roeder, 1995)+ Activation of splicing during meiosis requires a splicing enhancer located downstream of the 59 splice site (Spingola & Ares, 2000) and the product of the MER1 gene that is only expressed during meiosis and specifically binds to the MER2 splicing enhancer (Nandabalan & Roeder, 1995;Spingola & Ares, 2000)+ Another well-studied example is the ribosomal protein L30, which regulates splicing of the transcript of its own gene, RPL30+ Binding of L30 to an RNA structure formed by nucleotides surrounding the noncanonical 59 splice site of RPL30 inhibits splicing prior to the first step (Eng & Warner, 1991;Vilardell & Warner, 1994)+ Finally, autoregulation of DBP2, a member of the DEAD-box family of putative RNA helicases, depends on the presence of a 1,002-nt intron, the largest in S. cerevisiae (Barta & Iggo, 1995)+ To our knowledge, YRA1 is the first example of a yeast gene that causes a dramatic growth defect when its intron is removed+ No effect on growth has been observed as a result of DBP2 overexpression from a cDNA copy (Barta & Iggo, 1995)+ Moreover, a cocultivation assay capable of revealing subtle differences in biological fitness was required to show that mutations in RPL30 that abolish autoregulation lead to detectably slower growth only over the course of many generations (Li et al+, 1996)+…”
Section: Expression Of Yra1p Is Regulated On the Level Of Splicingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The YRA1 intron is unusual in size, location within the coding region, and in the sequence of one of the consensus splicing signals (Portman et al+, 1997 (2002) was that cells expressing YRA1 containing the RPL25 intron from the YRA1 promoter had a slight dominantnegative growth defect at 37 8C+ Intriguingly, some of the introns we have tested, notably that of ACT1, could partially complement the growth defect of YRA1-⌬IVS+ It thus seems that the YRA1 intron shares some characteristics that are relevant for autoregulation with a subset of introns from unrelated yeast genes+ These observations will likely facilitate the identification of cisacting regulatory elements in the YRA1 transcript+ For example, like the YRA1 intron, the RPL25 and ACT1 introns are unusually large (414 and 408 nt, respectively), whereas both the UBC8 and YRA1 introns have branchpoint sequences that differ from the normally highly conserved consensus at the first position (CAC UAAC and GACUAAC, respectively)+ In addition, the discrepancies between our findings and those of Rodriguez-Navarro et al+ (2002) might, at least in part, also reflect subtle differences in the experimental details involved, such as different strain backgrounds or plasmid-copy numbers+ Even though we do not know at this point which of the peculiarities of the YRA1 intron mentioned above are involved in autoregulation, each of these characteristics has been shown to be important in the few reports of regulated splicing in yeast+ One prominent example is the meiosis-specific splicing of MER2 premRNA+ During mitotic growth, basal splicing efficiency is lowered by a noncanonical 59 splice site and an unusually large 59 exon (Engebrecht et al+, 1991;Nandabalan & Roeder, 1995)+ Activation of splicing during meiosis requires a splicing enhancer located downstream of the 59 splice site (Spingola & Ares, 2000) and the product of the MER1 gene that is only expressed during meiosis and specifically binds to the MER2 splicing enhancer (Nandabalan & Roeder, 1995;Spingola & Ares, 2000)+ Another well-studied example is the ribosomal protein L30, which regulates splicing of the transcript of its own gene, RPL30+ Binding of L30 to an RNA structure formed by nucleotides surrounding the noncanonical 59 splice site of RPL30 inhibits splicing prior to the first step (Eng & Warner, 1991;Vilardell & Warner, 1994)+ Finally, autoregulation of DBP2, a member of the DEAD-box family of putative RNA helicases, depends on the presence of a 1,002-nt intron, the largest in S. cerevisiae (Barta & Iggo, 1995)+ To our knowledge, YRA1 is the first example of a yeast gene that causes a dramatic growth defect when its intron is removed+ No effect on growth has been observed as a result of DBP2 overexpression from a cDNA copy (Barta & Iggo, 1995)+ Moreover, a cocultivation assay capable of revealing subtle differences in biological fitness was required to show that mutations in RPL30 that abolish autoregulation lead to detectably slower growth only over the course of many generations (Li et al+, 1996)+…”
Section: Expression Of Yra1p Is Regulated On the Level Of Splicingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In S. cerevisiae, extraribosomal functions for Rpl2, Rps14, Rpl30, and Rps28 in autoregulation of their own synthesis have been demonstrated (Eng and Warner 1991;Presutti et al 1991;Fewell and Woolford 1999;Badis et al 2004). Two other known cases of extraribosomal functions are for Rps20 and Rpl6, proteins that are capable of influencing Pol III transcription (Hermann-Le Denmat et al 1994;Dieci et al 2009).…”
Section: Functional Specificity Of Rp Paralogs and Extraribosomal Funmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eukarya, it appears that L7Ae homologs have become more specialized. For instance, L30e complexes with 60S rRNA and its own coding mRNA (Eng and Warner 1991), 15.5kD with U4 snRNA ) and box C/D snoRNAs (Watkins et al 2000), and Nhp2 with box H/ACA snoRNAs (Henras et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%