2009
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00323-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Basis for the Localization of the Chemotaxis Phosphatase CheZ by CheA S

Abstract: CheA-short interacts with CheZ to localize CheZ to cell poles. The fifth helical region (residues 112 to 133) from the phosphotransfer domain of CheA interacts with CheZ and becomes ordered and helical, although it lacks a stable fold in the CheA fragment comprising residues 98 to 150 alone. One CheA molecule binds to one CheZ dimer.During bacterial chemotaxis, transmembrane receptors regulate the activity of the chemotaxis-specific histidine autokinase CheA with the aid of a coupling protein, CheW. CheA acts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In E. coli , the polar localization of CheZ is achieved by binding with a short form of CheA (CheA EC ), which begins at Met-98 of full length CheA EC ( Cantwell et al, 2003 ; Hao et al, 2009 ). There is only one CheA protein encoded in A. caulinodans genome, termed as CheA AC .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In E. coli , the polar localization of CheZ is achieved by binding with a short form of CheA (CheA EC ), which begins at Met-98 of full length CheA EC ( Cantwell et al, 2003 ; Hao et al, 2009 ). There is only one CheA protein encoded in A. caulinodans genome, termed as CheA AC .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CheZ EC interacts with CheA using a small region of amino acids with most interactions coming from the apical hairpin loop consisting of two aromatic residues, Phe-97 and Trp-98 ( Cantwell and Manson, 2009 ). For CheAs, two hydrophobic residues Leu-123 and Leu-126 in the N-terminus of CheA are responsible for CheZ EC interactions ( Cantwell et al, 2003 ; Hao et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In E. coli , a subpopulation of CheZ is associated with the transmembrane complex composed of chemoreceptors, the CheA sensor kinase, and the CheW scaffolding protein [23,24]. CheZ localization is mediated by interaction between the hairpin end of the four-helix bundle (Figure 2a) and an exposed hydrophobic helix of CheA-short (CheA s )- a truncated version of CheA [2527]. Association of CheZ with CheA s increases CheZ phosphatase activity by two to three-fold [28].…”
Section: Regulation Of Chez Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association of CheZ with CheA s increases CheZ phosphatase activity by two to three-fold [28]. Binding between relevant fragments of CheA s and CheZ results in NMR chemical shift perturbations that propagate down the CheZ four-helix bundle to the catalytic site, providing a possible structural explanation for CheZ activation by CheA s [25]. Clustering of CheZ at the cell poles results in a homogenous concentration of CheYp across the length of the cell [29,30] which may be important in synchronization of the rotational direction of flagellar motors.…”
Section: Regulation Of Chez Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several observations support this proposed mechanism for the GOF mutants and their suppressors. First, there is direct nuclear magnetic resonance evidence for the propagation of structural changes along the CheZ four-helix bundle upon the binding of the CheA S protein to the hairpin end (7,13). Furthermore, CheA S has been reported to enhance CheZ activity about 2-fold (21,40), an enhancement similar in magnitude to that exhibited by GOF mutants, thus raising the possibility that structural changes in the bundle affect CheZ activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%