1970
DOI: 10.1126/science.170.3957.497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Aspects of Interatomic Charge-Transfer Bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
318
0
6

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
10
318
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The elongation effect arises also from major differences existing between the non-conventional C-H···O=C hydrogen bond [49] length (2.343 Å) and the C-Br···O=C halogen bond length (3.060 Å). In fact, this latter distance is 9% shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of Br and O [50][51][52], Looking along the b-axis ( Figure 3, top views of the supramolecular walls), there is no significant difference either. The repetitive unit along the c-axis is just a little bit longer in 2 (c = 12.274 Å) by comparison with 1 (c = 11.898 Å).…”
Section: Crystallographic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elongation effect arises also from major differences existing between the non-conventional C-H···O=C hydrogen bond [49] length (2.343 Å) and the C-Br···O=C halogen bond length (3.060 Å). In fact, this latter distance is 9% shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of Br and O [50][51][52], Looking along the b-axis ( Figure 3, top views of the supramolecular walls), there is no significant difference either. The repetitive unit along the c-axis is just a little bit longer in 2 (c = 12.274 Å) by comparison with 1 (c = 11.898 Å).…”
Section: Crystallographic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The elongation effect arises also from major differences existing between the non-conventional C-H¨¨¨O=C hydrogen bond [49] length (2.343 Å) and the C-Br¨¨¨O=C halogen bond length (3.060 Å). In fact, this latter distance is 9% shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of Br and O [50][51][52], strongly suggesting that there is more at stake than a simple van der Waals contact between the two heteroatoms. This is also supported by the alignment of the four atoms C-Br¨¨¨O=C matching that of the C-H¨¨¨O=C atoms involved in a hydrogen bond [53].…”
Section: Crystallographic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Chlorines, bromines, and iodines in organic and inorganic compounds are known to polarize along their covalent bonds to generate an electropositive crown; the halogen thus acts as a Lewis acid to pair with Lewis bases, including oxygens and nitrogens. These electrostatic pairs, originally called charge-transfer bonds (1), are now known as halogen bonds (X-bonds), recognizing their similarities to hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) in their strength and directionality (2). In chemistry, X-bonds are being exploited in the design and engineering of supramolecular assemblies (3) and molecular crystals (for review, see ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the structures of 1 and 2 the driving force of the crystal architecture are quite strong C-HÁÁÁX halogen bonds (X=Br for 1, I for 2). This kind of interaction, postulated in the 1960s [34,35] and confirmed as an important player in the determination of the crystal structure (e.g. [36,37] and references therein), are in principle electrostatic interactions between a covalently bound halogen atom and the lone pair of the ''acceptor'' atom, and they should be quite directional.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%