2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2019.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and magnetic response of CrI3 monolayer to electric field

Abstract: A recent theoretical study reported large effects of perpendicular electric fields on the atomic structure of a monolayer CrI 3 , which could be related to the microscopic origin of the technologically promising and experimentally observed electrical switching of magnetization in bilayer CrI 3 .However, those theoretical results are not in line with a previous theoretical finding of only slight changes under a strong electric field in CrI 3 . Given the important consequences that the presence of large structur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent inelastic neutron-scattering (INS) experiments have shown a gap opening along the high-symmetry lines in pristine CrI 3 16 , implying a sizable DMI or Kitaev interaction 19 may indeed exist in CrI 3 . In contrast, ab initio investigations show that both DMI [20][21][22][23] and Kitaev interactions 23,24 in pristine CrI 3 are insufficient to open up the sizable gap observed in experiments. The role of the relativistic magnetic interactions is still not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent inelastic neutron-scattering (INS) experiments have shown a gap opening along the high-symmetry lines in pristine CrI 3 16 , implying a sizable DMI or Kitaev interaction 19 may indeed exist in CrI 3 . In contrast, ab initio investigations show that both DMI [20][21][22][23] and Kitaev interactions 23,24 in pristine CrI 3 are insufficient to open up the sizable gap observed in experiments. The role of the relativistic magnetic interactions is still not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theory side, a large number of studies was devoted to a microscopic analysis of magnetism in 2D CrI 3 and its analogues [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Most of them were based on first-principles calculations (density functional theory and beyond) with direct mapping on the Heisenberg model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the 5% compression along z, d 1 decreases by 3.2% and d 2 by 2.4%. These changes and their difference are much stronger than the ones resulting from the application of large electric fields perpendicular to the monolayer [32].…”
Section: Uniaxial Versus Biaxial Strain On Cri 3 Bilayermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This corresponds to a ratio zz / xx = −0.5, which is 10 times smaller in magnitude than with the applied uniaxial perpendicular strains (see Appendix). We also note that compared to vertical electric fields [32,33], the vertical strains have a non-negligible influence on the internal atomic structure of each CrI 3 monolayer (as described in the Appendix).…”
Section: System and Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%