2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Functional Insights into Bacillus subtilis Sigma Factor Inhibitor, CsfB

Abstract: SummaryGlobal changes in bacterial gene expression can be orchestrated by the coordinated activation/deactivation of alternative sigma (σ) factor subunits of RNA polymerase. Sigma factors themselves are regulated in myriad ways, including via anti-sigma factors. Here, we have determined the solution structure of anti-sigma factor CsfB, responsible for inhibition of two alternative sigma factors, σG and σE, during spore formation by Bacillus subtilis. CsfB assembles into a symmetrical homodimer, with each monom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later in sporulation, CsfB is produced in the mother cell, under the control of σ K and helps preventing protracted activity of σ E , to which it also binds an inhibits (Serrano et al. 2015; Martinez-Lumbreras et al. 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later in sporulation, CsfB is produced in the mother cell, under the control of σ K and helps preventing protracted activity of σ E , to which it also binds an inhibits (Serrano et al. 2015; Martinez-Lumbreras et al. 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SGTA is highly conserved throughout mammals and higher eukaryotes with the TPR domain sharing the greatest similarity across the different species (Martinez-Lumbreras et al, 2018). The N-terminal domain of SGTA forms a tight dimer with a negatively charged patch on its surface which has been shown to bind with positively charged UBL domains from both BAG6 and UBL4A domain through electrostatic interactions (Darby et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sgtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically TPR domains (Darby et al, 2014); TPR domain (red) residues 84-210 from PDB: 2VYI (Dutta & Tan, 2008). There is currently no solved structure for the C-terminal domain (blue) which encompasses NNP and Q-rich regions (Martinez-Lumbreras et al, 2018). are made up of between 3 and 16 tandem repeats-SGTA contains 3 repeats with each repeat containing 2 almost identically structured antiparallel folded alpha helices (Dutta & Tan, 2008;Krysztofinska et al, 2017). There is additionally a seventh alpha helix known as the C-terminal capping helix that aligns against the second helix of the third repeat, helix 6.…”
Section: Sgtamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction between RNAP and σ factors has been considered a target for novel antimicrobial discovery [9,10,11,12,13] as opposed to other inhibitors which target RNAP enzyme activities (such as rifampicin binding near the active site, lipiarmycin leading to allosteric inhibition of template DNA binding, myxopyronin and squaramides blocking the switch region of the RNAP clamp open-close) [5]. Previously, by rational design and pharmacophore model-based in silico screening, we have identified three chemical compounds (Figure 2) that inhibit bacterial RNAP-σ interaction by binding to the CH region of RNAP [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%