2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-021-00945-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional diversity among agonist-bound states of the GLP-1 receptor

Abstract: This document is the author's post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
80
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
10
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting both observations is the fact that the positive functional modulation () of LY298 and VU154 in Gi1 signalling assays is driven by positive binding modulation (), as the efficacy modulation () of the PAMs was negative to neutral (Figure 2J, S1E). These observations were consistent with recent studies that suggest the conformational dynamics between agonist and receptor were important for functional signalling (Bumbak et al, 2020;Cary et al, 2022;Deganutti et al, 2022;O'Connor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Supporting both observations is the fact that the positive functional modulation () of LY298 and VU154 in Gi1 signalling assays is driven by positive binding modulation (), as the efficacy modulation () of the PAMs was negative to neutral (Figure 2J, S1E). These observations were consistent with recent studies that suggest the conformational dynamics between agonist and receptor were important for functional signalling (Bumbak et al, 2020;Cary et al, 2022;Deganutti et al, 2022;O'Connor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While the ECD, where the peptide C-terminus initially recognizes class B1 GPCRs, remains less well-resolved than other regions, the resolution of structures determined through cryo-EM has drastically improved over the past five years through advances in sample preparation, data collection, and data processing, and is predicted to continue improving with sub-2.5 Å cryo-EM structure determination being increasingly routine for class B1 GPCR–G protein complexes [ 288 ]. Moreover, direct information on 3D conformational dynamics captured during vitrification can increasingly be extracted through sophisticated analytical methods [ 304 , 345 ] and such dynamics play critical roles in peptide recognition and modes of receptor activation that may not be apparent from high-resolution consensus reconstructions [ 304 , 332 , 346 , 347 ]. This information can be integrated with other methods for interrogating GPCR dynamics, including hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) [ 348 ], single-molecule FRET studies [ 349 ] and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [ 350 , 351 ] and holds promise for further enhancing peptide drug design [ 348 , 352 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous data suggested that plasticity of the peptide-TMD engagement is relevant for activity at the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) (Cary et al, 2022;Deganutti et al, 2022), a related class B1 GPCR, where the N-terminus of some peptides become partially or fully unbound in 3DVA associated with outward movement of ECL3. This dynamic behaviour was commonly observed in peptides that have residues that can destabilise helical secondary structure of the activation domain of those peptides (Johnson et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Cary et al, 2022). In contrast, all PTH1R-peptide complexes in the current study exhibited stable interactions between the peptide N-terminus and the receptor core (Video S1), suggesting that this interaction might be generally more stable than for agonists of the GLP-1R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full-length peptide agonists of the PTH1R bind in a two-step process (Castro et al, 2005), corresponding to sequential binding to the ECD and the TMD. Previous data suggested that plasticity of the peptide-TMD engagement is relevant for activity at the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) (Cary et al, 2022;Deganutti et al, 2022), a related class B1 GPCR, where the N-terminus of some peptides become partially or fully unbound in 3DVA associated with outward movement of ECL3. This dynamic behaviour was commonly observed in peptides that have residues that can destabilise helical secondary structure of the activation domain of those peptides (Johnson et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Cary et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%