2015
DOI: 10.1530/erc-15-0099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional consequences of succinate dehydrogenase subunit B mutations

Abstract: Mitochondrial dysfunction, due to mutations of the gene encoding succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), has been implicated in the development of adrenal phaeochromocytomas, sympathetic and parasympathetic paragangliomas, renal cell carcinomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumours and more recently pituitary tumours. Underlying mechanisms behind germline SDH subunit B (SDHB) mutations and their associated risk of disease are not clear. To investigate genotype-phenotype correlation of SDH subunit B (SDHB) variants, a homol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the impaired binding may arise from secondary consequences of the p.Arg46 mutation. Interestingly, our previous structural modeling of these SDHB mutations had not identified the functional impact on SDHB, as both glycine and glutamine are capable of fitting within the space left by arginine, and the electron path is not nearby [25]. The findings of our current study suggest that mutations affecting residue 46 of SDHB are pathogenic via preventing maturation of SDHB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the impaired binding may arise from secondary consequences of the p.Arg46 mutation. Interestingly, our previous structural modeling of these SDHB mutations had not identified the functional impact on SDHB, as both glycine and glutamine are capable of fitting within the space left by arginine, and the electron path is not nearby [25]. The findings of our current study suggest that mutations affecting residue 46 of SDHB are pathogenic via preventing maturation of SDHB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The SDHAF3 variant was generated in a commercially available plasmid, pCMV6-SDHAF3-Myc-DDK (RC204626, Origene); while the SDHB mutants were generated in a plasmid (pEGFP-N1; 6085–1, Clonetech) containing wild-type SDHB . Briefly, normal SDHB cDNA was generated from human adrenal total RNA and inserted into pEGFP-N1, using EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites, as previously described [25]. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the presence of wild-type or variant sequences, and that they were in-frame with the respective tag.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indistinguishable from SDH-sufficient samples) contained SDHB mutation c.380T > G, p.Ile127Ser. This was particularly interesting to us, since we have recently described a method for measuring mutant SDH function in vitro, and this same mutation was found to have minimal impact on enzymatic function [30]. It is intriguing therefore to speculate that SDH-deficient PPGLs with normal succinate:fumarate ratios are associated with mutations that do not primarily alter SDH activity and may otherwise cause tumor development through alternative mechanisms (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDH genes, including SDHB , may be associated with a variety of tumors [1517, 19, 2325]. Two models have been proposed to explain how SDH loss-of-function mutations lead to tumor formation [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal tumors in patients bearing SDHB mutations present various histological subtypes [15, 1922]. Moreover, mutations in SDHB have been implicated in neuroblastomas [13,17], thyroid carcinoma [15,19], pituitary tumors [23], gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) [24], seminoma, prostatic adenocarcinoma, and lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the stomach [25]. Reduced SDHB expression is associated with growth and de-differentiation of colorectal cancer cells [26], and shorter survival time of patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%