2015
DOI: 10.1111/boc.201500004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional analysis of tunneling nanotubes (TnTs) using gCW STED and gconfocal approaches

Abstract: Due to large disparity of TnT-like structures in neuronal, immune, cancer or epithelial cells, high- and superresolution approaches can be utilised for full characterisation of these yet poorly understood routes of cell-to-cell communication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
6
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confocal microscopy allowed the identification of actin-positive and tubulin-negative TNTs containing myosin 10 protein (Additional file 3: Figure S3 d) in neuronal CAD cells. These structures are easily detectable via live imaging in overexpressing systems of actin and tubulin, with a diameter of approximately 400 nm and lengths ranging from 10 to 30 μm (Additional file 4: Figure S4 a), and they are rapidly formed thanks to a “filopodia-like” (Additional file 4: Figure S4 b and d) or a “kiss-and-run” mechanism (Additional file 4: Figure S4 c and e), as previously described [24, 26, 27]. Altogether, these data showed that we have engineered all necessary tools for identifying TNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Confocal microscopy allowed the identification of actin-positive and tubulin-negative TNTs containing myosin 10 protein (Additional file 3: Figure S3 d) in neuronal CAD cells. These structures are easily detectable via live imaging in overexpressing systems of actin and tubulin, with a diameter of approximately 400 nm and lengths ranging from 10 to 30 μm (Additional file 4: Figure S4 a), and they are rapidly formed thanks to a “filopodia-like” (Additional file 4: Figure S4 b and d) or a “kiss-and-run” mechanism (Additional file 4: Figure S4 c and e), as previously described [24, 26, 27]. Altogether, these data showed that we have engineered all necessary tools for identifying TNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In contrast, basket/stellate cells coming from the IGL directly cross the PCL without any transient arrest phase [18]. Super-resolution approaches including STimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy [40,41,42] and correlative microscopy [43] could now offer new possibilities to decipher the roles of cell–cell contacts between granule cells, basket/stellate cells, Purkinje cells, and Bergmann glial cells in key steps of cerebellar interneuron migration including the crossing of the PCL.…”
Section: Cellular Highway Network Within the First Two Postnatal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like EVs, TNTs also represent subtypes and heterogeneous morphological structures (Austefjord et al, 2014; Benard et al, 2015). However, biosynthesis of TNTs differs from EVs and is attributed to f-actin polymerization (Gungor-Ordueri et al, 2015; Osteikoetxea-Molnar et al, 2016).…”
Section: Biogenesis and Physicochemical Aspects Of Evs And Tntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike EVs the TNTs are better known for shipping whole organelles by direct tubular connections between cells, such as mitochondria, lysosomes and Golgi vesicles (Rustom et al, 2002, 2004; Gerdes et al, 2007; Gurke et al, 2008b; Plotnikov et al, 2008; Wang and Gerdes, 2015; Han et al, 2016; Jackson et al, 2016; Torralba et al, 2016). The thicker subset of TNTs may range up to 0.7 microns (Onfelt et al, 2004; Benard et al, 2015), which is more favorable for the transport of larger organelles and lysosomal vesicles (Onfelt et al, 2006). TNTs also transport cytosolic Ca 2+ and electrical signals to neighboring cells (Wang et al, 2010; Smith et al, 2011; Lock et al, 2016).…”
Section: Tnts and Evs: Synergies In Cargo Transfer And Intercellular mentioning
confidence: 99%