2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6fd00198j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and elemental influence from various MOFs on the performance of Fe@C catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

Abstract: The structure and elementary composition of various commercial Fe-based MOFs used as precursors for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) catalysts have a large influence on the high-temperature FTS activity and selectivity of the resulting Fe on carbon composites. The selected Fe-MOF topologies (MIL-68, MIL-88A, MIL-100, MIL-101, MIL-127, and Fe-BTC) differ from each other in terms of porosity, surface area, Fe and heteroatom content, crystal density and thermal stability. They are re-engineered towards FTS catalys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a control experiment employing pyrolyzed molecular Fe-oxo clusters showed little activity, underlining the importance of a framework-type precursor for pyrolysis and generating dispersed Fe particles. Wezendonk et al 129 further investigated the effect of the MOF precursor using different MOFs while employing fixed pyrolysis conditions. It was found that under the same temperature, the different MOFs undergo a similar degree of carbonization of the framework by decarboxylation.…”
Section: (C) Cobalt (Co)-mofmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a control experiment employing pyrolyzed molecular Fe-oxo clusters showed little activity, underlining the importance of a framework-type precursor for pyrolysis and generating dispersed Fe particles. Wezendonk et al 129 further investigated the effect of the MOF precursor using different MOFs while employing fixed pyrolysis conditions. It was found that under the same temperature, the different MOFs undergo a similar degree of carbonization of the framework by decarboxylation.…”
Section: (C) Cobalt (Co)-mofmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After pyrolysis, none of the materials show diffraction patterns of their precursors, evidencing the decomposition of the framework in the case of the MOF and full transformation of the AlOOH binder into γ-Al2O3. In situ measurements in our group have proven that the iron phases present in the 38Fe@C composite after pyrolysis at 500 °C consist of a mixture of metallic iron (Fe), iron (II) oxide (FeO) and iron carbides (FeC) 8 . The highly dispersed Fe particles are very pyrophoric after preparation, and the required passivation step at room temperature readily converts significant amounts of the Fe phase into Fe3O4.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, these results point out that the lower activity for higher amount of binder is not only linked to the Fe particle size variation in the composites but also to possible Fe-Al interactions created during the pyrolysis, which although not detected by PXRD may still be present. The Fe-Al interactions may hinder carburization of Fe towards its transformation into Hägg carbide (χ-Fe5C2) during the activation period in HT-FTS 8 , leading to a lower overall activity.…”
Section: Sco2 %mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) are functional porous metal compound material with Metallic nodes interlinked by electron‐donating organic linkers . For the moment, MOFs has been widely used in catalysis , drug delivery and energy storage owing to its outstanding porous, crystal structure and special fictionalization. For this reason, as the gas electrode catalyst for lithium‐oxygen batteries has started to be researched right now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%