“…[18] A more recent study focused on ADT derivatives also reported a higher field-effect mobility, µ, in the pure anti -isomer, and found that both types of pure isomer devices outperformed the mix -isomer sample. [19] That publication reports µ values of 2.0, 2.2, and 4.7 cm 2 V −1 s −1 for OFET devices of the mix -, syn -, and anti -isomers, of 2,8-difluoro-5,11-bis(triethylsilylethynyl) anthradithiophene (diF-TES ADT) and 2.3, 2.7, and 6.2 cm 2 V −1 s −1 in 2,8-difluoro-5,11-bis(triethylgermylethynyl) anthradithiophene (diF-TEG ADT). In addition, research into other 1D and 2D aromatic molecules, as well as polymers of isomeric monomers, indicate a general disparity in performance between isomers of the same compound.…”