2005
DOI: 10.13182/fst05-a807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Analysis of the NCSX Vacuum Vessel

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…whether their moments were parallel or antiparallel to the hexahedral axes, were also free to vary. The hexahedra were constructed around an inner limiting surface with the dimensions of the NCSX vacuum vessel [27,29], which we note is not the same as the winding surface used to constrain the NCSX coils [30]. A minimum gap spacing of 2 cm was enforced between the magnets and the limiting surface.…”
Section: Scan Of Magnet Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whether their moments were parallel or antiparallel to the hexahedral axes, were also free to vary. The hexahedra were constructed around an inner limiting surface with the dimensions of the NCSX vacuum vessel [27,29], which we note is not the same as the winding surface used to constrain the NCSX coils [30]. A minimum gap spacing of 2 cm was enforced between the magnets and the limiting surface.…”
Section: Scan Of Magnet Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whether their moments were parallel or antiparallel to the hexahedral axes, was also free to vary. The hexahedra were constructed around an inner limiting surface with the dimensions of the NCSX vacuum vessel [13,16], which we note is not the same as the winding surface used to constrain the NCSX coils [17]. A minimum gap spacing of 2 cm was enforced between the magnets and the limiting surface.…”
Section: Scan Of Magnet Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%