2012
DOI: 10.1038/pj.2012.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) during uniaxial drawing above the glass transition temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the strain hardening zone, the crystallization was captured since the further nucleation and growth of crystallite facilitated the lamellar crystals into microfibrillar crystals with strain increasing, while the lamellar could fragment under large strain, which led to further microfibrillar splitting and catastrophic breakage. Similarly, the strain-induced structural formation of completely amorphous PET film at 90 and 100 °C was discussed by Okada et al It was noted that the new lamellar crystals appeared during drawing, and the isolated lamellae changed to stacked lamellae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the strain hardening zone, the crystallization was captured since the further nucleation and growth of crystallite facilitated the lamellar crystals into microfibrillar crystals with strain increasing, while the lamellar could fragment under large strain, which led to further microfibrillar splitting and catastrophic breakage. Similarly, the strain-induced structural formation of completely amorphous PET film at 90 and 100 °C was discussed by Okada et al It was noted that the new lamellar crystals appeared during drawing, and the isolated lamellae changed to stacked lamellae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Uniaxial extension of 1‐SP showed significant alignment of the crystallites in both WAXS and SAXS spectra, which is consistent with other polymers, such as polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyethylene furanoate, among others. [ 35,41–43 ] These ε ‐dependent SIC analyses were compared to in situ chromatic data; analogous to Δ S blue , X c and Δ H m were normalized to their initial values, according to Equations () and (), giving Δ X c and Δ(Δ H m ): normalΔXcbadbreak=Xnormalc(Xnormalc)ε=00.33em$$\begin{equation} {\Delta}{X}_{\mathrm{c}}=\frac{{X}_{\mathrm{c}}}{({X}_{\mathrm{c}})_{\varepsilon =0}}\ \end{equation}$$ normalΔ()ΔHnormalm0.33embadbreak=normalΔHm(ΔHnormalm)ε=00.33em$$\begin{equation} {\Delta}\left({\Delta}{H}_{\mathrm{m}}\right)\ =\frac{{\Delta}{H}_{\mathrm{m}}}{({\Delta}{H}_{\mathrm{m}})_{\varepsilon =0}}\ \end{equation}$$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniaxial extension of 1-SP showed significant alignment of the crystallites in both WAXS and SAXS spectra, which is consistent with other polymers, such as polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyethylene furanoate, among others. [35,[41][42][43] These 𝜖dependent SIC analyses were compared to in situ chromatic data; analogous to ΔS blue , X c and ΔH m were normalized to their initial values, according to Equations ( 7) and ( 8), giving ΔX c and Δ(ΔH m ):…”
Section: Elongation-dependent Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the microfibrillar structure and oriented chain appeared in the plastic deformation region at 90 and 100 C, but crystallization was not evident. SAXS pattern changing from X-shaped pattern to the four-spot can be attributed to the formation of new lamellar crystals during drawing and the isolated lamellae changed to stacked lamellae [8,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%