2008
DOI: 10.1086/587685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Analysis of Molecular Clouds: Dendrograms

Abstract: We demonstrate the utility of dendrograms at representing the essential features of the hierarchical structure of the isosurfaces for molecular line data cubes. The dendrogram of a data cube is an abstraction of the changing topology of the isosurfaces as a function of contour level. The ability to track hierarchical structure over a range of scales makes this analysis philosophically different from local segmentation algorithms like CLUMPFIND. Points in the dendrogram structure correspond to specific volumes … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
562
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(570 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
562
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The flux uncertainties in Table 1 reflect the difficulty of estimating the separation between the sources and the underlying filament. It is calculated by taking the average of the clipping and the bijection schemes of the flux estimates (Rosolowsky et al 2008). We characterised the compact sources further by checking their association with Spitzer 24 µm point-like sources, and their fragmentation as seen in the 8 µm extinction map (see Fig.…”
Section: Mass Partition In Sdc13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux uncertainties in Table 1 reflect the difficulty of estimating the separation between the sources and the underlying filament. It is calculated by taking the average of the clipping and the bijection schemes of the flux estimates (Rosolowsky et al 2008). We characterised the compact sources further by checking their association with Spitzer 24 µm point-like sources, and their fragmentation as seen in the 8 µm extinction map (see Fig.…”
Section: Mass Partition In Sdc13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify structures within the ALMA spectral line cubes, we used the Python package astrodendro, which decomposes emission into a hierarchy of structures (Rosolowsky et al 2008;Shetty et al 2012;Colombo et al 2015). Parameters were chosen so that the algorithm identified local maxima in the cube above the 3σ rms level that were also at least 2.5σ rms above the merge level with adjacent structures.…”
Section: Structural Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All properties are determined using the "bijection" approach discussed by Rosolowsky et al (2008), which associates all emission bounded by an isosurface with the identified structure. From these basic properties we have calculated additional properties, including the effective rms spatial size, σ r = √ σ maj σ min , the spherical radius R = 1.91σ r ,…”
Section: Structural Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For consistency, we adopt the sizebased terminology given to these scales in Bergin & Tafalla (2007): a "core" ranges in size between 0.03 and 0.2 pc and a "clump" from 0.3 to 3 pc, and both entities are found within the boundaries of several parsec sized "clouds". The SABOCA angular resolution accesses the "core" scale in our sample of IRDCs.One method that quantitatively describes this hierarchy is a structure tree algorithm, popularly implemented in astronomy with the dendrogram representation (Rosolowsky et al 2008). An advantage to using this technique is that it imposes no assumptions about the shape or emission profile of the tree structures, and it operates on both two and three dimensional datasets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%