2013
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2013.2261187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Analysis of Laplacian Spectral Properties of Large-Scale Networks

Abstract: Using methods from algebraic graph theory and convex optimization, we study the relationship between local structural features of a network and spectral properties of its Laplacian matrix. In particular, we derive expressions for the so-called spectral moments of the Laplacian matrix of a network in terms of a collection of local structural measurements. Furthermore, we propose a series of semidefinite programs to compute bounds on the spectral radius and the spectral gap of the Laplacian matrix from a truncat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concretely, we use the eigenvalues to compare graphs because the spectral moments of the non-backtracking matrix describe certain aspects of the length spectrum (see "Operationalizing the length spectrum" section). The spectral moments of other matrices (e.g., adjacency and Laplacian matrices) also describe structural features of networks (Estrada 1996;Preciado et al 2013). Many distance methods have been proposed recently (Soundarajan et al 2014;Koutra et al 2016;Bagrow and Bollt 2018;Bento and Ioannidis 2018;Onnela et al 2012;Schieber et al 2017;Chowdhury and Mémoli 2017;2018;Berlingerio et al 2013;Yaveroglu et al 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concretely, we use the eigenvalues to compare graphs because the spectral moments of the non-backtracking matrix describe certain aspects of the length spectrum (see "Operationalizing the length spectrum" section). The spectral moments of other matrices (e.g., adjacency and Laplacian matrices) also describe structural features of networks (Estrada 1996;Preciado et al 2013). Many distance methods have been proposed recently (Soundarajan et al 2014;Koutra et al 2016;Bagrow and Bollt 2018;Bento and Ioannidis 2018;Onnela et al 2012;Schieber et al 2017;Chowdhury and Mémoli 2017;2018;Berlingerio et al 2013;Yaveroglu et al 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make the standing assumption that the local dynamics (19) admit a stable fixed point x * and that the units synchronize, so that the solutions X(t) of (19)- (20) converge to the (stable) fixed point X * = [x * . .…”
Section: Nonlinear Systems With Identical Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koopman operator Let X(t) be a trajectory solution of (19)- (20) associated with the initial condition X 0 . We suppose that p ≪ n measurements of X(t) are obtained through a possibly nonlinear observation function f : R mn → R p , which depends on a few local states in our case.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us consider a discrete random variable X whose probability density function is µ LH . The moments of this random variable satisfy the following [19]:…”
Section: Moment-based Spectral Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying Theorem 4.1 to the spectral density µ LH of a given graph H with spectral moments (m 0 , m 1 , ..., m 2r+1 ), we can find a lower bound on its largest eigenvalue, λ 1 (L H ), as follows [19]:…”
Section: Moment-based Spectral Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%