2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06452-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of HTL and D14 proteins reveals the basis for ligand selectivity in Striga

Abstract: HYPOSENSITIVE TO LIGHT (HTL) and DWARF14 (D14) mediate the perception of karrikin and strigolactone, which stimulates germination of the parasitic weed Striga. However, their role in parasitic seeds is poorly understood, and the basis for their differing responsiveness remains unclear. Here, we show that Striga hermonthica HTL proteins (ShHTLs) in ‘conserved’ and ‘intermediate’ clades are able to bind karrikin. The ‘divergent’ clade is able to hydrolyze strigolactone. Unexpectedly, we find that ShD14 is also c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
105
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
12
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ligand specificity is a key contributor to the functional distinction between karrikin and strigolactone receptors, and elucidating the molecular mechanisms behind ligand specificity is a significant research challenge. In certain root-parasitic weeds in the Orobanchaceae, substitutions of bulky residues found in AtKAI2 with smaller hydrophobic amino acids that increase the ligand-binding pocket size have likely improved the affinity for host-derived strigolactone ligands, as opposed to the smallersized karrikin-type ligands [57][58][59] . Moreover, lid-loop residues that affect the rigidity and size of the ligand entry tunnel determine the ligand selectivity between KAR 1 and ent-5-deoxystrigol (a strigolactone analogue with non-natural stereochemistry) among eleven KAI2 homologues in Physcomitrella patens 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ligand specificity is a key contributor to the functional distinction between karrikin and strigolactone receptors, and elucidating the molecular mechanisms behind ligand specificity is a significant research challenge. In certain root-parasitic weeds in the Orobanchaceae, substitutions of bulky residues found in AtKAI2 with smaller hydrophobic amino acids that increase the ligand-binding pocket size have likely improved the affinity for host-derived strigolactone ligands, as opposed to the smallersized karrikin-type ligands [57][58][59] . Moreover, lid-loop residues that affect the rigidity and size of the ligand entry tunnel determine the ligand selectivity between KAR 1 and ent-5-deoxystrigol (a strigolactone analogue with non-natural stereochemistry) among eleven KAI2 homologues in Physcomitrella patens 60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous results 37,38 , D-OH induced S. hermonthica germination (EC 50 = 1.2 μM). Moreover, in Arabidopsis lines expressing a GFP fused to ShHTL7, the known S. hermonthica SL receptor 30,39 , was induced by (±)-DOH (EC 50 = 3.1 μM) (Supplementary Figure 14, Supplementary Table 1). In summary, our study validates the perception of D-OH by SL receptors in root-parasitic plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are subtle differences between the unbound forms of D14 and KAI2 that are presumed to determine ligand specificities (Kagiyama et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2013). In both Arabidopsis and rice, D14 has a larger binding pocket than KAI2 (Kagiyama et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2016), which is also seen in Striga D14-like ShHTL proteins that perceive SL, which have consistently larger pockets than KAI2like ShHTL proteins that perceive KAR (Xu et al, 2016(Xu et al, , 2018. These differences are due to the replacement of some of the pocketforming residues with bulkier ones, particularly within the cap, and the closer position of the cap domain relative to the protein core (Kagiyama et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2013Zhao et al, , 2015Xu et al, 2016Xu et al, , 2018Hameed et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2018;Burger et al, 2019).…”
Section: On the Doorstep: Ligand-receptor Bindingmentioning
confidence: 96%