2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1397-002x.2001.00001_952.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of fertilinβ cyclic peptide mimics that are ligands for α6β1 integrin

Abstract: The NMR structural analysis of two fertilin(beta) mimics cyclo(EC2DC1)YNH2, 1, and cyclo(D2EC2D1C1)YNH2, 2 is described. Both of these mimics are moderate inhibitors of sperm-egg binding with IC50 values of 500 microm in a mouse in vitro fertilization assay. For peptide 1, the optimized conformations that best match the NMR data have a pseudo-type II' beta-turn with the linker and Glu at the i+1 and i+2 positions, respectively. The EC2D1C1 sequence is in a nonclassical (type IV) beta-turn. For peptide 2, the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a search, we hope to find the global minimum and the ensemble of lowest energy structures, which is mainly composed of local energy minima or energies that are close to the global minimum. While in reality these molecules achieve their equilibrium conformational ensembles in short time spans [1][2][3][4][5], two main obstacles hinder the prediction in silico of their three-dimensional structures. First, a search for the lowest energy conformers on the potential energy surface is considered to be a non-polynomial (NP)-hard problem for proteins [6] and peptides should not be different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a search, we hope to find the global minimum and the ensemble of lowest energy structures, which is mainly composed of local energy minima or energies that are close to the global minimum. While in reality these molecules achieve their equilibrium conformational ensembles in short time spans [1][2][3][4][5], two main obstacles hinder the prediction in silico of their three-dimensional structures. First, a search for the lowest energy conformers on the potential energy surface is considered to be a non-polynomial (NP)-hard problem for proteins [6] and peptides should not be different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%