2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Analysis of Chemokine Receptor–Ligand Interactions

Abstract: This review focuses on the construction and application of structural chemokine receptor models for the elucidation of molecular determinants of chemokine receptor modulation and the structure-based discovery and design of chemokine receptor ligands. A comparative analysis of ligand binding pockets in chemokine receptors is presented, including a detailed description of the CXCR4, CCR2, CCR5, CCR9, and US28 X-ray structures, and their implication for modeling molecular interactions of chemokine receptors with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 255 publications
2
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference, and an intriguing finding of our study, consists in the polar interaction of the E291 7.39 side chain with the secondary amine of MK-0812. E 7.39 is present in most chemokine receptors and several mutation studies in literature have shown that this residue is important for small-molecule ligand binding to CXCR4, CCR5, CCR2, and US28 (Arimont et al, 2017). In CXCR4 (Wu et al, 2010) and CCR5 structures (Tan et al, 2013b) the corresponding residues E288 7.39 and E283 7.39 are involved in hydrogen bond and ionic interactions with the co-crystallized ligands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference, and an intriguing finding of our study, consists in the polar interaction of the E291 7.39 side chain with the secondary amine of MK-0812. E 7.39 is present in most chemokine receptors and several mutation studies in literature have shown that this residue is important for small-molecule ligand binding to CXCR4, CCR5, CCR2, and US28 (Arimont et al, 2017). In CXCR4 (Wu et al, 2010) and CCR5 structures (Tan et al, 2013b) the corresponding residues E288 7.39 and E283 7.39 are involved in hydrogen bond and ionic interactions with the co-crystallized ligands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All cytokines perform their biological functions upon binding to their transmembrane receptors. These transmembrane receptors are divided into six types according to their structure (Arimont et al 2017;Grötzinger 2002) and include type I and type II cytokine receptors, the immunoglobin superfamily of receptors, the TNF receptor family, chemokine receptors, and TGF-␤ receptors.…”
Section: Generation Of Pro-inflammatory Cytokinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…include a particular helix positioning where the top of TM2 is tilted owing to the presence of the T 2.56 xP 2.58 motif, a feature that is shared with other protein and peptide receptors (e.g., opioid receptors); a highly conserved disulfide bridge between the N-terminus and ECL3; the open, solvent-accessible 7TM domain; and a diversity of druggable pockets, in line with the chemical diversity among chemokine receptor ligands (Arimont et al, 2017).…”
Section: Structural Determinants Of Chemokine Receptor Ligand Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%