Spool 2019
DOI: 10.7480/spool.2019.1.3892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Adaptation through Stiffness Tuning

Arwin Hidding,
Henriette Bier,
Qinyu Wang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Component and material design was Voronoi-based and involved consideration with respect to stability, lightweight, and comfort requiring variable stiffness and 3D printing without support. 4 The variable stiffness concept developed in previous research (Hidding et al, 2019) has been implemented in this case study in order to create cushioning for the seating areas while keeping the structural integrity of the furniture components, i.e., booths intact. The cushioning principle was prototyped by robotically milling into Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) that in this case was emulating the support surface, which has high stiffness.…”
Section: Materials Design and Robotic Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Component and material design was Voronoi-based and involved consideration with respect to stability, lightweight, and comfort requiring variable stiffness and 3D printing without support. 4 The variable stiffness concept developed in previous research (Hidding et al, 2019) has been implemented in this case study in order to create cushioning for the seating areas while keeping the structural integrity of the furniture components, i.e., booths intact. The cushioning principle was prototyped by robotically milling into Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) that in this case was emulating the support surface, which has high stiffness.…”
Section: Materials Design and Robotic Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of robotic 3D printing, the angles of the geometry have to be optimized 4 This implies that the angles of the faces of the Voronoi cells have to be within 3D printing tolerances with printing angles between −45 to +45 degrees in relation to the printing bed. to be within the angle constraints of −45 to +45 degrees for printing without support material (Hidding et al, 2019). Also, the size of the components and subcomponents are optimized to fit in the bounding box determined by the reachability of the robotic arm.…”
Section: Materials Design and Robotic Prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%