1979
DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(79)90063-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects were laterally presented with two double-digit numbers, one above the other, and were required to perform a timed discriminatory bimanual response. Similar findings of a right hemisphere superiority have been reported in a variety of laterally-presented versions of the Stroop task (Cohen & Martin, 1975;Pieters, 1981 ;Tsao, Feustel, & Soseos, 1979;Vaid & Lambert, 1979). For half the stimuli there was an incongruent relationship-i.e., if the upper tens-position digit was the larger, the units-position digit was the smaller, or vice versa.…”
Section: Studies With Normalssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Subjects were laterally presented with two double-digit numbers, one above the other, and were required to perform a timed discriminatory bimanual response. Similar findings of a right hemisphere superiority have been reported in a variety of laterally-presented versions of the Stroop task (Cohen & Martin, 1975;Pieters, 1981 ;Tsao, Feustel, & Soseos, 1979;Vaid & Lambert, 1979). For half the stimuli there was an incongruent relationship-i.e., if the upper tens-position digit was the larger, the units-position digit was the smaller, or vice versa.…”
Section: Studies With Normalssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This effect seems to be less strong than the interference (Mac Leod 1991). Additionally, interference for reaction time (RT; Dyer 1973) and/or error rates are assumed to be greater in the left hemisphere than in the right as shown by different studies (Schmit and Davis 1974;Tsao et al 1979), presumably because of interference of language (word reading, left hemisphere dominance) on color naming. Similar results were found when using evoked potentials (Aine and Harter 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For instance, Dyer (1973) and Downloaded by [185.101.69.45] at 07:53 15 June 2016 Tsao, Feustel, and Soseos (1979) both found a greater Stroop effect for words presented to the RVF/LH than for words presented to the LVF/RH, indicating greater interference from the words when attempting to name the colors. The left hemisphere appears to be more affected by interference than the right hemisphere for naming the color of a word when it conflicts with the word itself (e.g, the word green printed in red).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%