2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2011.11.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly non-embeddable metric spaces

Abstract: Enflo [3] constructed a countable metric space that may not be uniformly embedded into any metric space of positive generalized roundness. Dranishnikov, Gong, Lafforgue and Yu [2] modified Enflo's example to construct a locally finite metric space that may not be coarsely embedded into any Hilbert space. In this paper we meld these two examples into one simpler construction. The outcome is a locally finite metric space (Z, ζ) which is strongly non embeddable in the sense that it may not be embedded uniformly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that this is so for coarse embeddings into any metric space that satisfies a classical condition, called generalized roundness p ∈ (0, ∞), which was introduced and used by Enflo [44] to answer an old question of Smirnov [65] whether every metric space embeds uniformly into a Hilbert space (strictly speaking, [42] considered only the case p = 2, but the argument works mutatis mutandis for any p > 0). A unified treatment of these approaches, so as to rule out coarse and uniform embeddings simultaneously, appears in [93]. As noted by several authors [158,103,153,93], a "vanilla" application of the approach of [42] fails to apply to targets that are general Alexandrov spaces of nonpositive curvature, i.e., to prove Theorem 1.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They showed that this is so for coarse embeddings into any metric space that satisfies a classical condition, called generalized roundness p ∈ (0, ∞), which was introduced and used by Enflo [44] to answer an old question of Smirnov [65] whether every metric space embeds uniformly into a Hilbert space (strictly speaking, [42] considered only the case p = 2, but the argument works mutatis mutandis for any p > 0). A unified treatment of these approaches, so as to rule out coarse and uniform embeddings simultaneously, appears in [93]. As noted by several authors [158,103,153,93], a "vanilla" application of the approach of [42] fails to apply to targets that are general Alexandrov spaces of nonpositive curvature, i.e., to prove Theorem 1.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A unified treatment of these approaches, so as to rule out coarse and uniform embeddings simultaneously, appears in [93]. As noted by several authors [158,103,153,93], a "vanilla" application of the approach of [42] fails to apply to targets that are general Alexandrov spaces of nonpositive curvature, i.e., to prove Theorem 1. Indeed, a combination of the characterization of generalized roundness in [109] with the work [51] shows that there are Alexandrov spaces of nonpositive curvature that do not have positive generalized roundness; specifically, this is so for the quaternionic hyperbolic space (and not so for the real and complex hyperbolic spaces [58,51]).…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dranishnikov et al [7] modified Enflo's example to construct a locally finite metric space that is not coarsely embeddable in any Hilbert space, thereby settling a prominent question of Gromov. Kelleher et al [19] unified these examples to construct a locally finite metric space that is not uniformly or coarsely embeddable in any metric space of positive generalised roundness. One may also use generalised roundness as a highly effective isometric invariant by exploiting the connection between generalised roundness and negative type due to Lennard et al [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%