2002
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.71.2881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly Enhanced DD Fusion Reaction in Metals Observed for keV D+Bombardment

Abstract: The excitation functions of the yield of protons emitted in the D(d,p)T reaction in Ti, Fe, Pd, PdO and Au were measured for bombarding energies between 2.5 and 10 keV. It was found that the reaction rate at lower energies varies greatly with the host materials. The most strongly enhanced DD reaction occurs in PdO. At E d ¼ 2:5 keV, it is enhanced by factor of fifty from the bare deuteron rate and the screening energy deduced from the excitation function amounts to 600 eV. An enhancement of this size cannot be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
100
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron screening in d(d,p)t was studied previously for deuterated metals, insulators, and semiconductors, i.e. 58 samples in total [2,3] (see also [4,5]). As compared to measurements performed with a gaseous D 2 target (U e = 25 eV [6]), a large screening was observed in the metals (of order U e = 300 eV), a e-mail: raiola@ep3.rub.de; for the LUNA Collaboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron screening in d(d,p)t was studied previously for deuterated metals, insulators, and semiconductors, i.e. 58 samples in total [2,3] (see also [4,5]). As compared to measurements performed with a gaseous D 2 target (U e = 25 eV [6]), a large screening was observed in the metals (of order U e = 300 eV), a e-mail: raiola@ep3.rub.de; for the LUNA Collaboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured values are however not compatible with the adiabatic estimate [8,9,10,11,12]. Dynamical calculations have been performed, but they obviously cannot explain the discrepancy as they include atomic excitations and ionizations which reduce the energy available for fusion.…”
Section: Nuclear Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This case has been studied in great detail experimentally, as one can control different charge states of the projectile+target system in the laboratory [8,9,10,11,12]. The experimental findings disagree systematically by a factor of two or more with theory.…”
Section: Nuclear Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to explain the experimental results in Sendai [1,2,3], in Bochum and Gran Sasso [4,5,6,7,8,9], and in Berlin [10,12,11] are based on:…”
Section: The Experimental Situation and Interpretation Of The Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%