2017
DOI: 10.1038/tp.2017.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong seduction: impulsivity and the impact of contextual cues on instrumental behavior in alcohol dependence

Abstract: Alcohol-related cues acquire incentive salience through Pavlovian conditioning and then can markedly affect instrumental behavior of alcohol-dependent patients to promote relapse. However, it is unclear whether similar effects occur with alcohol-unrelated cues. We tested 116 early-abstinent alcohol-dependent patients and 91 healthy controls who completed a delay discounting task to assess choice impulsivity, and a Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigm employing both alcohol-unrelated and alcohol-re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study evaluated the effects of reward-predicting cues on behavior, using a PIT task in which classical conditioning trials were optimized for fMRI. Our results are consistent with a growing number of studies demonstrating PIT effects in humans (Seabrooke et al, 2017;Sommer et al, 2017b;Verhoeven, Watson and de Wit, 2018;Vogel et al, 2018) and provide additional evidence for behavioral invigoration in presence of a classically conditioned stimulus. The current PIT paradigm was developed to allow Pavlovian conditioning to be completed in an MRI scanner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study evaluated the effects of reward-predicting cues on behavior, using a PIT task in which classical conditioning trials were optimized for fMRI. Our results are consistent with a growing number of studies demonstrating PIT effects in humans (Seabrooke et al, 2017;Sommer et al, 2017b;Verhoeven, Watson and de Wit, 2018;Vogel et al, 2018) and provide additional evidence for behavioral invigoration in presence of a classically conditioned stimulus. The current PIT paradigm was developed to allow Pavlovian conditioning to be completed in an MRI scanner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A little more than half of the studies examined appetitive conditioning. Many of these studies have focused on examining addictive behavior, e.g., to food (Pool et al, 2015;Quail, Laurent and Balleine, 2017;Seabrooke et al, 2017;van Steenbergen et al, 2017), to nicotine (Hogarth, 2012;Hogarth, Maynard and Munafò, 2015;Manglani et al, 2017) and to alcohol (Martinovic et al, 2014;Garbusow et al, 2016;Hardy et al, 2017;Sommer et al, 2017a). Other studies have used PIT paradigms to evaluate how stress and depressed mood affect motivation (Huys et al, 2016;Quail, Laurent and Balleine, 2017), or to study the neural correlates of the transfer effects in non-disordered populations (Paredes-Olay et al, 2002;Talmi et al, 2008a;Allman et al, 2010;Geurts et al, 2013;Hebart and Gläscher, 2015;Sebold et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess whether grey‐matter information captured the severity of the disease within the AD group, we predicted the amount of lifetime ethanol consumption based on grey‐matter data. Life time alcohol consumption was estimated using the measures provided by CAPI‐CIDI regarding drinking amounts during the last 12 months and periods of maximal alcohol consumption in combination with representative data of alcohol‐dependent patients in Germany (; see references and for previous uses of this measure). Grey‐matter data consisted of the 110 regional atlas‐based grey‐matter concentration averages of each participant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase statistical power, we have omitted other conceptualization of PIT, e.g. as an interference task (Sommer et al, 2017), and hence any limbic-dorso-lateral-prefrontal connectivity (Bray et al, 2008). Future studies should explore this.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%