2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.042340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong quantum solutions in conflicting-interest Bayesian games

Abstract: Quantum entanglement has been recently demonstrated as a useful resource in conflicting interest games of incomplete information between two players, Alice and Bob [Pappa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 020401 (2015)]. General setting for such games is that of correlated strategies where the correlation between competing players is established through a trusted common adviser; however, players need not reveal their input to the adviser. So far, quantum advantage in such games has been revealed in a restricted se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the late 90's quantum versions of it, that is, games in which players share quantum states and actions are translated into unitary operations, were first presented [5,6]. An active and diverse literature has then been established, connecting quantum correlations to various forms of games [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 90's quantum versions of it, that is, games in which players share quantum states and actions are translated into unitary operations, were first presented [5,6]. An active and diverse literature has then been established, connecting quantum correlations to various forms of games [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] just to mention a few. The CHSH game also has a conflict of interest variant [9] which inspired detailed studies of games with a similar equilibrium structure [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the Eisert-Lewenstein-Wilkens quantum game scheme [9,[13][14][15][16] concentrates on the quantization of strategy negotiation process, where strategy operations are expanded from classical bit operators to unitary quantum gates, and the measurement basis for move decision is assumed to be constant. In contrast, players adjust the measurement basis in Marinatto's scheme [17][18][19][20][21] and Bayesian quantum games [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] to optimize their move decision policies. Entanglement improves players' payoffs and quantum uncertainty keeps the fairness of the game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%