1980
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90407-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong QCD corrections to p-wave quarkonium decays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have already mentioned, in the calculations of Barbieri et al of the P-wave decay rates into light hadrons [7,8,21], a logarithmic dependence on an infrared cutoff appeared in the coefficients of |R The factorization formulas (4.7) for the annihilation decays of P-waves at leading order in v were first given in Ref. [10] in the form…”
Section: B P-wave Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As we have already mentioned, in the calculations of Barbieri et al of the P-wave decay rates into light hadrons [7,8,21], a logarithmic dependence on an infrared cutoff appeared in the coefficients of |R The factorization formulas (4.7) for the annihilation decays of P-waves at leading order in v were first given in Ref. [10] in the form…”
Section: B P-wave Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The short-distance factor was calculated in terms of the running coupling constant α s (M) of QCD, evaluated at the scale of the heavy-quark mass M, while the long-distance factor was expressed in terms of the meson's nonrelativistic wavefunction, or its derivatives, evaluated at the origin. In the case of S-waves [5,6] and in the case of P-wave decays into photons [7], the factorization assumption was supported by explicit calculations at next-to-leading order in α s . However, no general argument was advanced for its validity in higher orders of perturbation theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is impressively consistent with the measurement (2a). Nevertheless, these processes are sensitive to the next-to-leading-order (NLO) radiative correction [17,18], with the predicted R scattered in the range from 0.09 to 0.36 [6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%