2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.012059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong planar subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases and their dual fracton orders

Abstract: We classify subsystem symmetry-protected topological (SSPT) phases in 3 + 1D protected by planar subsystem symmetries, which are dual to abelian fracton topological orders. We distinguish between weak SSPTs, which can be constructed by stacking 2 + 1D SPTs, and strong SSPTs, which cannot. We identify signatures of strong phases, and show by explicit construction that such phases exist. A classification of strong phases is presented for an arbitrary finite abelian group. Finally, we show that fracton orders rea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The toy model we introduce here is a subsystem symmetric topological state [131][132][133][134][135][136] with gapless edge modes, which we refer to as topological plaquette Ising model (TPIM).…”
Section: Subsystem Symmetry Protected Topological Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toy model we introduce here is a subsystem symmetric topological state [131][132][133][134][135][136] with gapless edge modes, which we refer to as topological plaquette Ising model (TPIM).…”
Section: Subsystem Symmetry Protected Topological Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new paradigm in the classification of gapped phases of matter has recently begun thanks to the discovery of models with novel subdimensional physics. This includes the fracton topological phases [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], in which topological quasiparticles are either immobile or confined to move only within subsystem such as lines or planes, as well as models with subsystem symmetries, which are symmetries that act nontrivially only on rigid subsystems of the entire system [7,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. These two types of models are dual since gauging subsystem symmetries can result in fracton topological order, analogous to how topological order can be obtained by gauging a global symmetry [7,8,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models with subsystem symmetries are also interesting in their own right. For example, one may use them to define symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases, giving rise to the so-called subsystem SPT (SSPT) phases [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]26,28]. SSPT phases display new physics compared to conventional SPT phases such as extensive edge degeneracy and unique entanglement properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classifications of subsystem symmetry protected phases have been proposed [38][39][40][41]. Some of these classifications have been based on the twist phase, a topological invariant related to the projective representations of the symmetry group.…”
Section: B Subsystem Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogously, while there are no frac-ton topological phases in 2D spin systems [36,37], there are nontrivial SSPT phases that exhibit similar topological phenomena with respect to subsystem symmetric operators [22,23]. To date, the classification of these phases has garnered significant interest and ample progress [38][39][40][41] but a consensus has not been reached. This raises a natural question: What is the nature of the flows generated by SSPTs under subsystem symmetry-preserving ERG?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%