1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19991115)38:22<3329::aid-anie3329>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong P=P π Bonds: The First Synthesis of a Stable Phosphanyl Phosphenium Ion

Abstract: A 35-fold excess of methyl triflate (2) is required to quantitively prepare 3, the first phosphanyl phosphenium ion, from diphosphene 1. Experimental data and calculations indicate that the P=P bond becomes stronger upon alkylation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…55 The phosphorus atom of 1b bearing the anthryl group may attack the C=C bond of 30c due to steric reasons to give 32, which may retain its P=P double-bond analogously to a previous report of an isolated phosphanyl phosphenium ion, [Mes*P=P(Me)Mes*] + bearing significant P=P double-bond character. 56 Taking into consideration the zwitterionic species 32, the ³-bond of the (NC)C=C(CN) moiety of 32 should be weakened enough to be rotated along with the CC axis to give 32¤. Then, the cleavage of the PC bond of 32¤ should occur to afford 1b and maleonitrile.…”
Section: 54supporting
confidence: 89%
“…55 The phosphorus atom of 1b bearing the anthryl group may attack the C=C bond of 30c due to steric reasons to give 32, which may retain its P=P double-bond analogously to a previous report of an isolated phosphanyl phosphenium ion, [Mes*P=P(Me)Mes*] + bearing significant P=P double-bond character. 56 Taking into consideration the zwitterionic species 32, the ³-bond of the (NC)C=C(CN) moiety of 32 should be weakened enough to be rotated along with the CC axis to give 32¤. Then, the cleavage of the PC bond of 32¤ should occur to afford 1b and maleonitrile.…”
Section: 54supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The most striking feature of both structures is the sideon bonding mode of the R 2 P2=P1 fragment belonging to the ligand R 2 P=P-PR 2 , which was first observed for [(1,2η 2 -R 2 P=P-PR 2 )M(Cl)L] (L = tertiary phosphine; M = Ni, Pd, Pt). [33,34] The bonding situation of these dihapto ligands is such that the cation can be described as a diphosphenium cation [35] (Scheme 5, structure A) with a significant contribution from the second canonical structure B representing the non-classical phosphido ligand. Similar structures are known for complexes of Ni group metals with the η 2 -bonded tBu 2 -P-PtBu 2 ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Because of their inherent electrophilicity, most of the known phosphenium salts (R 2 P ϩ ) feature two π-donor substituents such as amino groups. [13] Notable exceptions are the (amino)(mesityl)- [14] and (phosphanyl)(supermesityl)-phosphenium [15] salts, which both feature an electron-rich [ aryl substituent. Given the potential uses of phosphenium salts as strong π-acceptor ligands, [16] it was of interest to investigate the possibility of preparing a phosphenium salt featuring an electron-withdrawing group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%