“…However, many studies also illustrated that melt memory still exists after the crystal fragments are completely melted at higher temperatures ( T s > T m,end ) for various polymers including isotactic polypropylene and propene/ethylene random copolymers, segmented thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers (TPUs), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) homopolymer and poly(butylene succinate- ran -butylene azelate) copolyesters, poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), ,, ethylene/1-hexene random copolymers, 1-butene/ethylene random copolymers (PB1- ran -PE), and poly( l -lactide)-based block copolymers . In some reports, a strong memory effect has been found even beyond the equilibrium melt temperature ( T m 0 ) of polymers ( T s > T m 0 ) in a few homopolymers like trans -1,4-polyisoprene and some copolymers containing ethylene/1-butene random copolymers analogous to hydrogenated polybutadienes (HPBDs) , and butene-1/norbornene (NBE) random copolymers . Therein, the key factor for SN in these copolymers is the melt topology complexity due to the long stable crystallizable sequence aggregation and the formation of topological constraints, i.e., loops, links, and ties in the intercrystalline regions, resulting in heterogeneous melts at temperatures above T m 0 . ,− Apart from this, different hypotheses for the exact nature of the melt memory effect have been suggested for specific systems, for instance, residual segmental orientations inside the pre-existing crystals, ,,, molten clusters (embryos), , residual segmental interactions, an inhomogeneous intermediate metastable melt state, ,,, a state with weak liquid–liquid phase separation, and heterogeneous distribution in melt entanglements. , …”