2005
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200510362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong mean field dynamos require supercritical helicity fluxes

Abstract: Abstract. Several one and two dimensional mean field models are analyzed where the effects of current helicity fluxes and boundaries are included within the framework of the dynamical quenching model. In contrast to the case with periodic boundary conditions, the final saturation energy of the mean field decreases inversely proportional to the magnetic Reynolds number. If a nondimensional scaling factor in the current helicity flux exceeds a certain critical value, the dynamo can operate even without kinetic h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
99
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is only slightly modified compared with dynamo saturation in a periodic domain. For not too large values of Re M the dynamo saturates relatively swiftly, but for larger values of Re M the magnetic field strength may decline with increasing value of Re M (Brandenburg & Subramanian 2005). An example of the saturation behavior is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Dynamo Saturationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The situation is only slightly modified compared with dynamo saturation in a periodic domain. For not too large values of Re M the dynamo saturates relatively swiftly, but for larger values of Re M the magnetic field strength may decline with increasing value of Re M (Brandenburg & Subramanian 2005). An example of the saturation behavior is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Dynamo Saturationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a periodic domain, the dynamo is expected to reach and sustain mean fields of the order of the inverse square root of the scale separation ratio (Blackman & Brandenburg 2002). However, in an open domain the final saturation field strength is always of the order of R −1/2 m (Brandenburg & Dobler 2001;Brandenburg & Subramanian 2005), although the mean field may reach an early equipartition strength peak just at the time when the small-scale field reaches saturation (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Nonlinear Interface Dynamo Without Helicity Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poleward-propagating mode is now driven by supercritical diffusive helicity fluxes, as opposed to supercritical Vishniac & Cho fluxes (see Brandenburg & Subramanian 2005, for examples of this behaviour). For the same model (R m = 2 × 10 5 ) there exists a critical κ c ∼ 10 −5 such that the secondary dynamo wave does not appear if κ 0 < κ c .…”
Section: Supercritical Diffusive Magnetic Helicity Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In open domains there is the possibility that the resulting magnetic field strength can still decrease to catastrophically quenched values unless there is a finite divergence of the magnetic helicity flux (Brandenburg & Subramanian 2005a). Such a flux can be driven efficiently in the presence of shear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%