2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-218x(03)00380-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong lower bounds for the prize collecting Steiner problem in graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCSTLib benchmark [13], was used in several studies, e.g., [18,19], and contains graphs divided into two groups K and P, where 15%-27% and 34%-50% of the nodes are customers, respectively. The former are similar to street map layouts.…”
Section: Benchmark Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCSTLib benchmark [13], was used in several studies, e.g., [18,19], and contains graphs divided into two groups K and P, where 15%-27% and 34%-50% of the nodes are customers, respectively. The former are similar to street map layouts.…”
Section: Benchmark Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristic procedures are implemented in [Canuto et al, 2001, Klau et al, 2004 and [Salles da Cunha et al, 2009]. The first published work on polyhedral studies for the PCStT is [Lucena and Resende, 2004], where a cutting plane algorithm is proposed. The cuts are efficiently generated when a violation of a generalized subtour elimination constraint (GSEC) is verified.…”
Section: The Prize Collecting Steiner Tree Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints (2) and (3) force the network to be a tree. This model with T = ∅ was used by Lucena and Resende [35]. Margot et al [36] have proved that the x i j variables need not be declared as integer.…”
Section: Network Location Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%