2017
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong gravitational lensing inf(χ) = χ3/2gravity

Abstract: We discuss the phenomenology of gravitational lensing in the purely metric f(χ) gravity, an f(R) gravity where the action of the gravitational field depends on the source mass. We focus on the strong lensing regime in galaxy-galaxy lens systems and in clusters of galaxies. By adopting point-like lenses and using an approximate metric solution accurate to second order of the velocity field v/c, we show how, in the f(χ) = χ3/2 gravity, the same light deflection can be produced by lenses with masses smaller than … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X-rays' observations currently offer a powerful technique for building catalogs of galaxy clusters, which are very important for modern cosmology [14]. The X-ray GC emission is given by S x = 1 4π(1 + z) 4 n 2 e Λ eH (µ e /µ H )dl,…”
Section: Galaxy Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-rays' observations currently offer a powerful technique for building catalogs of galaxy clusters, which are very important for modern cosmology [14]. The X-ray GC emission is given by S x = 1 4π(1 + z) 4 n 2 e Λ eH (µ e /µ H )dl,…”
Section: Galaxy Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of X-rays and the SZ data leads to two useful cosmological tests, namely angular diameter distance d A [1] and gas mass fraction f gas of the GC [2]. Both tests have been used in the literature to investigate dark energy (DE) [3] and modified gravity (see [4] and reference therein). Additionally, the SGL observations also can be used to probe the dark matter (DM) and DE properties [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landau & Lifshitz 1982). That is, we cannot choose φ MOND (r) = +(GM a 0 ) 1/2 ln(r/r s ), unlike the treatment followed in Campigotto et al (2017). This fact explains their disagreement with the correct (−) sign found in Bernal et al (2011b); Mendoza et al (2013), and in this article.…”
Section: Weakest Field Limit O(2) Correctionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In Mendoza et al (2013), the details of gravitational lensing for individual, groups and clusters of galaxies at the outer regions of those systems were obtained considering a point-mass lens. Campigotto et al (2017) compared those results with specific observations of gravitational lensing and found a large discrepancy between the O(2) terms in the metric coefficients of the f (χ) = χ 3/2 gravity and the observations. However, to obtain the correct gravitational lensing it is necessary to take into account the massdensity distribution, using a suitable gravitational potential.…”
Section: Generalization To Extended Systemsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, MOND, introduced to fit galaxies rotation curves by Milgrom in 1983 [164,165], purports to replace DM. The DM effects of the MOND Newtonian modification also lead to other GR generalisations with the same aim [166][167][168][169] 2 A General Relativistic version of secondary infall models is at the root of works by a group including Mimoso and Le Delliou [188][189][190][191].…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%