2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00373-018-1885-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Geodetic Number of Complete Bipartite Graphs and of Graphs with Specified Diameter

Abstract: The strong geodetic problem is a recent variation of the classical geodetic problem. For a graph G, its strong geodetic number sg(G) is the cardinality of a smallest vertex subset S, such that each vertex of G lies on one fixed geodesic between a pair of vertices from S. In this paper, some general properties of the strong geodesic problem are studied, especially in connection with diameter of a graph. The problem is also solved for balanced complete bipartite graphs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong geodetic problem appears to be difficult even on complete bipartite graphs. Some initial investigation is done in [17], where the problem is presented as an optimization problem and the solution is found for balanced complete bipartite graphs. Some more results have been very recently presented in [19], where it is proved that the problem is NP-complete on general bipartite graphs, but polynomial on complete bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strong geodetic problem appears to be difficult even on complete bipartite graphs. Some initial investigation is done in [17], where the problem is presented as an optimization problem and the solution is found for balanced complete bipartite graphs. Some more results have been very recently presented in [19], where it is proved that the problem is NP-complete on general bipartite graphs, but polynomial on complete bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that m ≥ 4 as n ≥ 2m − 1, m even.On the other hand, 8n + 9 < (m + 1) 2 + 8 < (m + 2) 2 as m ≥ 4m is odd, sg a < sg b . But if m is even, then m + 1 is odd and by[17, Lemma 2.2], there exists an integer k such that (m + 1) 2 = 8k + 1. Clearly, 8n + 9 ≤ (m+1) 2 +7, but due to the congruences modulo 8, we conclude that 8n+9 ≤ (m+1) 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong geodetic number was further investigated on grids and cylinders, and on general Cartesian product graphs in [15,18], respectively. Additional properties, in particular with respect to the diameter, and a solution for balanced complete bipartite graphs were reported in [14]. The edge version of the problem has also been introduced and investigated in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first paper [16], it was proved that the problem is NP-complete. The invariant has also been determined for complete Apollonian networks [16], thin grids and cylinders [13], and balanced complete bipartite graphs [11]. Some properties of the strong geodetic number of Cartesian product of graphs have been studied in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall from [11] that the strong geodetic problem on a complete bipartite graph can be presented as a (non-linear) optimization problem as follows. Let (X, Y ) be the bipartition of K n 1 ,n 2 and S = S 1 ∪ S 2 , S 1 ⊆ X, S 2 ⊆ Y , its strong geodetic set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%