2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4953856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong enhancement of piezoelectric constants in ScxAl1−xN: First-principles calculations

Abstract: We theoretically investigate the piezoelectricity of ScxAl1−xN in the entire range of x by first-principles calculations. We find that the piezoelectric constants of wurtzite-type ScxAl1−xN significantly enhance as x increases from 0 to 0.75. However, the energy stability analyses between structure phases show that the cubic-type phases become more stable than the wurtzite-type phases at x of approximately 0.5 and higher, interfering with the ability of wurtzite-type ScxAl1−xN to realize the maximum piezoelect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(38 reference statements)
16
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The d 33 and the d 33,f of w-AlN are 4.08 pC/N and 5.27 pC/N, respectively, which are in good agreement with the experimentally reported values of 4.0 pC/N and 5.56 pC/N, respectively [40]. All the co-dopants increase both the total d 33 and the d 33,f of w-AlN (shown in Figure 3 [10,11] and theoretical values [41,12,35]. Additionally, Figure 3(a) shows a good agreement between our measured and calculated d 33 for w-AlN as well as Sc doping.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The d 33 and the d 33,f of w-AlN are 4.08 pC/N and 5.27 pC/N, respectively, which are in good agreement with the experimentally reported values of 4.0 pC/N and 5.56 pC/N, respectively [40]. All the co-dopants increase both the total d 33 and the d 33,f of w-AlN (shown in Figure 3 [10,11] and theoretical values [41,12,35]. Additionally, Figure 3(a) shows a good agreement between our measured and calculated d 33 for w-AlN as well as Sc doping.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…9,20,25) For the calculated wurtzite materials, the first (clamped ion) term shows relatively small negative values and does not significantly depend on material. The second (internal strain) term dominantly contributes to the trend of e 33 versus c=a shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This relationship has been demonstrated to apply to a large range of wurtzite-structure piezoelectric material systems which have c/a ratios larger than 1.5, including representative wurtzite-structure oxides (BeO, MgO, ZnO), nitrides (BN, AlN, GaN, InN, Sc 0.5 Al 0.5 N, and related alloys X 0.5 Zn 0.5 N where X = Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba), sulfides, selenides, tellurides, and iodides, and is based on an examination of the correlation between e 33 and c/a from experimental measurements and first-principles predictions. [30][31] In our More specifically, d 33 increases from 3.2 to 4.5 and 6.2 pC/N for x = 0, 0.20 and 0.36, reaches a maximum of d 33 = 6.4 pC/N for x = 0.48, and decreases to 5.9, 6.3, 6.3 pC/N for x = 0.62, 0.79, and 1.00, respectively. The inset also includes as black bar the reported d = 4.2 pC/N for AlN, [5a, 30,32] illustrating that the maximum piezoelectric response for (Ti 1−x Mg x ) 0.25 Al 0.75 N layers at x = 0.5 is 50% larger than that of the pure AlN matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%