2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Electric Field Observed at the Interface of Aqueous Microdroplets

Abstract: Chemical reactions in aqueous microdroplets often exhibit unusual kinetic and thermodynamic properties not observed in bulk solution. While an electric field has been implicated at the water interface, there has been no direct measurement in aqueous microdroplets, largely due to the lack of proper measurement tools. Herein, we employ newly developed stimulated Raman excited fluorescence microscopy to measure the electric field at the water−oil interface of microdroplets. As determined by the vibrational Stark … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
200
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
16
200
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kathmann et al using ab initio molecular dynamics found that the vapor-water interface has an average interfacial electric eld strength of − 1.5x10 2 MV/cm 27,28 , which is the order of magnitude expected for electric elds needed to drive most chemical reactions if well-aligned with relevant chemical bonds. This is in disagreement with recent stimulated Raman excited uorescence (SREF) microscopy that determined an averaged electric eld magnitude of only ~ 8 MV/cm at the surface for a similar oilwater microdroplet interface 29 , elds that are on the lower end for generating any signi cant surfacereactivity.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Kathmann et al using ab initio molecular dynamics found that the vapor-water interface has an average interfacial electric eld strength of − 1.5x10 2 MV/cm 27,28 , which is the order of magnitude expected for electric elds needed to drive most chemical reactions if well-aligned with relevant chemical bonds. This is in disagreement with recent stimulated Raman excited uorescence (SREF) microscopy that determined an averaged electric eld magnitude of only ~ 8 MV/cm at the surface for a similar oilwater microdroplet interface 29 , elds that are on the lower end for generating any signi cant surfacereactivity.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…30 that the anion in the tetraphenyl-arsonium/tetraphenyl-borate (TATB) hydrophobic ion pair prefers the interface while spectroscopy indicates the anion is more strongly hydrated in bulk water (72) gives a clear indication of an electrostatic driving force at work near the interface. It is also interesting to note that, in recent spectroscopic experiments (35), electric fields of magnitude 10 7 V/cm were estimated from Stark shifts of fluorescent probes near droplet surfaces, very close to the effective field observed in the present simulations. Ref.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We have suggested previously that there may be physical and chemical consequences to solvent-induced potential gradients through an interface even though the shifts are not directly measurable (29). The consequences include nonuniform ion density profiles (8,30), altered acid-base chemistry (31)(32)(33)(34), and electric fields probed by spectroscopic measurements at droplet surfaces (35). Experimental evidence is accumulating that suggests the effective surface potential of water (passing from the gas phase or a hydrophobic medium into water) is approximately −0.4 V, in agreement with earlier estimates (29,36,37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73 Measured electric eld strengths were in the range of 0.2-1 V nm À1 for charged nanodroplets 104 and in the order of 10 7 V nm À1 at the oil-water interface of rhodamine microemulsions. 105 It was reported that strong electric elds accelerate single molecule reactions by stabilizing charge separation in the transition state. 74,75 By analogy, strong elds may have similar effects within nano-and micro-droplets.…”
Section: Ion Transmission and Data Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%